Infractions And Bans

[luther]

Nor for me but that is the link back given. For ease of use


"I have webcam- but if you saw me your obsession with me would grow ever deeper- for the last time I will not fulfill that rape fantasy you got going"

This was a JOKE. It referred to something said previously.

I'd say it was taken that rape could never be taken as a joke......

[Lucy Chambers]

I'd say it was taken that rape could never be taken as a joke......

In normal context no, but in response to a joke about terrorizing people in a balaclava I would say it was obviously a joke.

[luther]

In normal context no, but in response to a joke about terrorizing people in a balaclava I would say it was obviously a joke.

Yes, I understand that Lucy, I'm not making excuses, agreeing or disagreeing. I'm just giving my opinon on why I think an infraction was given..........

If a number of people were offended by it and reported it the mods would have little choice but to do something about it........

[Lucy Chambers]

Yes, I understand that Lucy, I'm not making excuses, agreeing or disagreeing. I'm just giving my opinon on why I think an infraction was given..........

If a number of people were offended by it and reported it the mods would have little choice but to do something about it........

Fair enough. Perhaps it would be better for us all to be given a list of approved subjects, and that way there can be no falling foul of anything.

[Doozer]

Lucy most of it would be common sense
Everyone is free to have a laugh but you can still push what most of our users would consider the boundaries of good taste

[Lucy Chambers]

Lucy most of it would be common sense
Everyone is free to have a laugh but you can still push what most of our users would consider the boundaries of good taste

Then in that case I deserve an infraction too- it could be said I provoked him into it. I am not trying to have an argument Doozer, I am just troubled that a poster here could get an infraction for what I considered to be very lighthearted.

[Doozer]

Then in that case I deserve an infraction too- it could be said I provoked him into it. I am not trying to have an argument Doozer, I am just troubled that a poster here could get an infraction for what I considered to be very lighthearted.

I understand what your saying but as Luther says what if the shoe was on the other foot and some of these jibes were said at you or any other escort, people would be demanding action the same then goes for anyone giving that kind of abuse to anyone needs to be dealt with

[luther]

Fair enough. Perhaps it would be better for us all to be given a list of approved subjects, and that way there can be no falling foul of anything.

Yes, but if you were the victim of such an assault you may find it difficuly to see the funny side of it, regardless of the context...........

[Lucy Chambers]

Yes, but if you were the victim of such an assault you may find it difficuly to see the funny side of it, regardless of the context...........

Agreed. I can also see the validity in this, but surely there could just be a quick delete of the post then? Infact, no, forget it, I am going to my fish forum to argue with someone.

[Doozer]

Agreed. I can also see the validity in this, but surely there could just be a quick delete of the post then? Infact, no, forget it, I am going to my fish forum to argue with someone.

A quick delete wont work here Lucy. We have been down that road before and it has no effect
an infraction seems to be the only thing that works