Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 80

Thread: Censorship/Moderating Standards

  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qcumber View Post
    as a relative newbie, i sense a mod + escort V's Clients thing going on ! i think there is a slight bias towards the girls, and if the punters dont agree, the mods and ladies 'gang' up on em. Certain people seem to spend more time on here being condecending to other people and declaring their infallability on everything than working.
    Just my observation, and MY opinion !
    (im ready)
    ..................

    Ping.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  2. #22

    Default

    there yaa go ......

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qcumber View Post
    there yaa go ......
    Ah, so let me get this straight. You just had a little rant about condescending escorts, and when one doesnt give you the argument you require, you post a smilie saying im with stupid. That makes perfect sense.

    Im glad some of the ladies here speak up for themselves. Otherwise the site would be full of people just like you, with your inane comments of how we should be working not posting. Newsflash, we are on 200 yoyos per hour, we have time to waste
    Last edited by lucy chambers; 04-12-11 at 22:13.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doozer View Post
    I assume it was deleted carlos as you were nominating an escort regulater from the community which was deemed innapropriate .
    On a point of order Brother Doozer, in fact I did'nt nominate anyone as an escort regulator. Brother Gentelmandave posted the names of three members, whom he regarded as suitable candidates and I stated that I could add a fourth person to his list, who could fulfil the task with both hands tied behind his back. I also stated that a retired escort would make a very good escort regulator on the basis that to catch a poacher, a poacher turned gamekeeper would be suitably qualified.

    So, I neither nominated anyone for this fictitious position nor did I even come up with the notion of an escort regulator...........I merely tried to open up a debate.

    Given the activities that are advertised on this site and also debated on these forums, I would be interested to hear how a topic that does not directly involve either sex or money can be deemed inappropriate....maybe I'm just not debauched enough for this site......now that would be a first!

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to carlos marvado For This Useful Post:

    gentelmandave (04-12-11)

  6. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Ah, so let me get this straight. You just had a little rant about condescending escorts, and when one doesnt give you the argument you require, you post a smilie saying im with stupid. That makes perfect sense.

    Im glad some of the ladies here speak up for themselves. Otherwise the site would be full of people just like you, with your inane comments of how we should be working not posting. Newsflash, we are on 200 yoyos per hour, we have time to waste
    Yawn ......
    maybe you should walk away from the laptop for a while.... Just cos you can type doesnt make you clever, or the voice of the ladies..... regardless of how important YOU think you are.... or that people like your infallability stance

  7. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    I presume my comments were allowed because of SR71'S comments and conduct elsewhere Anon. As for hoping mud will stick, no not really, he went and wallowed in it.
    I didn't name names Lucy because it isn't just one lady and as you have pointed out it is not cut and dry but 2 wrongs don't make a right, you know that..

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to anon361 For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (04-12-11)

  9. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehighwayman View Post
    The links in the signatures isn't an order. That was one of the mods idea to promote the other sites. I think it was a great idea. It's not compulsary for a mod to have it.
    Well that's great Brother Highway that all mods now sing off the same hymn sheet..........as I recall back in the day, it was a major task to try to reach a consensus on occasions.

    But seeing as you clarified the issue of another community moderator coming up with the signature links and the others deciding to follow suit, when exactly did the role of community moderators change from volunteer site helpers who modded the forums according to written rules to promoting escort sites across the British Isles?

  10. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    I didn't name names Lucy because it isn't just one lady and as you have pointed out it is not cut and dry but 2 wrongs don't make a right, you know that..
    Of course I do Anon. I also know that the SR71 ones first post back after his absence was to have a dig at other ladies for supposedly complaining about prices. At no point did the young lady in question get slated for her prices. I also realise it mustnt be a very nice feeling to see what you consider bullying, I can only say in that case you would need to look at the forum I read to realise that the only bullies are the people that do their dirty work under multi nicks.

    You know me quite well, and you know im pretty straightforward. I wouldnt countenance bullying either. At no point did I feel that it was vitriolic, but I am open to correction if that was the case. SR71 took a mod job elsewhere, not only that then made crowing posts of a derogatory nature about ladies here, and then tried to come back under this ID to slate us further, erroneously. I dont feel that is cricket, do you?
    Last edited by lucy chambers; 04-12-11 at 22:29.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    gentelmandave (04-12-11)

  12. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qcumber View Post
    Yawn ......
    maybe you should walk away from the laptop for a while.... Just cos you can type doesnt make you clever, or the voice of the ladies..... regardless of how important YOU think you are.... or that people like your infallability stance
    I am clever, I dont need you to think I am. I am also very polite, which is why I havent told you to do one yet. I dont like your posts, I dont like your attitude or assumptions, but it is a free world. Good day.
    Last edited by lucy chambers; 04-12-11 at 22:32.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  13. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Of course I do Anon. I also know that the SR71 ones first post back after his absence was to have a dig at other ladies for supposedly complaining about prices. At no point did the young lady in question get slated for her prices. I also realise it mustnt be a very nice feeling to see what you consider bullying, I can only say in that case you would need to look at the forum I read to realise that the only bullies are the people that do their dirty work under multi nicks.

    You know me quite well, and you know im pretty straightforward. I wouldnt countenance bullying either. At no point did I feel that it was vitriolic, but I am open to correction if that was the case. SR71 took a mod job elsewhere, not only that then made crowing posts of a derogatory nature about ladies here, and then tried to come back under this ID to slate us further, erroneously. I dont feel that is cricket, do you?
    Lucy, you know me too, I tell it as I see it and while you may be aware of contributing factors as to why you posted some of the comments but me and others that don't really get involved it did come across a bit heavy handed, I'm not saying what you were saying was wrong but without showing proof just suggestions of further knowledge isn't really on, later on down the road someone else could say derogatory comments about a lady insinuating they had knowledge from other sources and without showing where that too wouldn't be right.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to anon361 For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (04-12-11)

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •