there yaa go ......
Ah, so let me get this straight. You just had a little rant about condescending escorts, and when one doesnt give you the argument you require, you post a smilie saying im with stupid. That makes perfect sense.
Im glad some of the ladies here speak up for themselves. Otherwise the site would be full of people just like you, with your inane comments of how we should be working not posting. Newsflash, we are on 200 yoyos per hour, we have time to waste
Last edited by lucy chambers; 04-12-11 at 22:13.
If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila
Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures
On a point of order Brother Doozer, in fact I did'nt nominate anyone as an escort regulator. Brother Gentelmandave posted the names of three members, whom he regarded as suitable candidates and I stated that I could add a fourth person to his list, who could fulfil the task with both hands tied behind his back. I also stated that a retired escort would make a very good escort regulator on the basis that to catch a poacher, a poacher turned gamekeeper would be suitably qualified.
So, I neither nominated anyone for this fictitious position nor did I even come up with the notion of an escort regulator...........I merely tried to open up a debate.
Given the activities that are advertised on this site and also debated on these forums, I would be interested to hear how a topic that does not directly involve either sex or money can be deemed inappropriate....maybe I'm just not debauched enough for this site......now that would be a first!
gentelmandave (04-12-11)
Lucy Chambers (04-12-11)
Well that's great Brother Highway that all mods now sing off the same hymn sheet..........as I recall back in the day, it was a major task to try to reach a consensus on occasions.
But seeing as you clarified the issue of another community moderator coming up with the signature links and the others deciding to follow suit, when exactly did the role of community moderators change from volunteer site helpers who modded the forums according to written rules to promoting escort sites across the British Isles?
Of course I do Anon. I also know that the SR71 ones first post back after his absence was to have a dig at other ladies for supposedly complaining about prices. At no point did the young lady in question get slated for her prices. I also realise it mustnt be a very nice feeling to see what you consider bullying, I can only say in that case you would need to look at the forum I read to realise that the only bullies are the people that do their dirty work under multi nicks.
You know me quite well, and you know im pretty straightforward. I wouldnt countenance bullying either. At no point did I feel that it was vitriolic, but I am open to correction if that was the case. SR71 took a mod job elsewhere, not only that then made crowing posts of a derogatory nature about ladies here, and then tried to come back under this ID to slate us further, erroneously. I dont feel that is cricket, do you?
Last edited by lucy chambers; 04-12-11 at 22:29.
If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila
Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures
gentelmandave (04-12-11)
Last edited by lucy chambers; 04-12-11 at 22:32.
If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila
Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures
Lucy, you know me too, I tell it as I see it and while you may be aware of contributing factors as to why you posted some of the comments but me and others that don't really get involved it did come across a bit heavy handed, I'm not saying what you were saying was wrong but without showing proof just suggestions of further knowledge isn't really on, later on down the road someone else could say derogatory comments about a lady insinuating they had knowledge from other sources and without showing where that too wouldn't be right.
Lucy Chambers (04-12-11)