Patty

[ChiefHandker]

Brother Carlos, tis me, crawling out of the rock...I don't agree with this banning until there is a post from Patty or any other banned member for that matter.(but that won't happen because their accounts are already banned)

I agree investigations were done, for all the matters not only now, but there is no explanation from the 'guilty' party. Yes, EI staff are doing their job but is not a democratic society we live in, in this day and age.

Everything we read comes from the decision taken by EI, if there was fixing of reviews etc, that shit happens, lets not deny it. Only it is done in very good way(I think).

I don't really understand your post. This isn't an episode of Scooby Doo where the guilty party comes out and say they would've gotten away with it had it not been for those meddlin' kids at E-I and then go on to explain themselves. I don't think E-I would ban a few of their paying advertisers without proper evidence or just on a hunch, do you? And in any case, banned members obviously can't post as yo know.

As for fixing of reviews probably being more widespread... well of course. But just because it happens far more than can be proven doesn't mean that action shouldn't be taken when it is proven.

[Amy Alison]

In my opinion the more serious charge is allowing access to our private forum to clients and other escorts. This has been proved, has it not?

Exactly. In any situation this charge alone would be enough to grant a ban for any escort.

[SR71]

I don't really understand your post. This isn't an episode of Scooby Doo where the guilty party comes out and say they would've gotten away with it had it not been for those meddlin' kids at E-I and then go on to explain themselves. I don't think E-I would ban a few of their paying advertisers without proper evidence or just on a hunch, do you? And in any case, banned members obviously can't post as yo know.

As for fixing of reviews probably being more widespread... well of course. But just because it happens far more than can be proven doesn't mean that action shouldn't be taken when it is proven.

Ah yeah, but they can still advertise, EI will still take their adverts, and say we don' want to ruin their lively hood. I watch a lot Scooby Doo episodes as well.!

[wolfie]

Just an opinion for what it may be worth. If banning is the punishment for serious breaches (correctly if proven) of the rules should the accused/guilty party not be given some time to publicly defend themselves before the ban takes effect? Most especially in the case of an Escort who depends heavily on the boards to conduct their business.
In light of recent events (banned members) I think it would limit speculation etc. and people could make a more accurate judgement on the decision taken.
I know that memers have strong feelings about people accused of "cheating" the system and understand that fully.

Just a thought

[Lucy Chambers]

Ah yeah, but they can still advertise, EI will still take their adverts, and say we don' want to ruin their lively hood. I watch a lot Scooby Doo episodes as well.!

And that is how it should be. What they won't be allowed to do is access our forum, have their husbands leave reviews or PM clients requesting fake reviews.

As it should be, no?

[Forrest]

In my opinion the more serious charge is allowing access to our private forum to clients and other escorts. This has been proved, has it not?

I haven't seen any proof. This is what Samlad posted.

- We know for a fact that someone had access to her account and had been quoting content from the private forums, hence the restricition of her account from the escort private forums. Since restricting her account, this activity had ceased. Patty contacted me on three seperate occasions to ask why her account was restricted, despite clear explainations and an acknowlegment of understanding

- We have reason to believe that other banned escorts are accessing her account

We have had our suspicions for a while now and finally we are now in a position to bring this matter to a close.

Who is the 'someone', and where were they quoting content from the private forum?
What 'activity' ceased?
What banned users are accessing her account, and how does E-I know that, unless they are in the room with them at the time?

Call me naive if you like, but this doesn't add up. I have met Patty and I think she is a very genuine person,
and I'm not some gullible young fella looking for brownie points.

[samlad]

Just an opinion for what it may be worth. If banning is the punishment for serious breaches (correctly if proven) of the rules should the accused/guilty party not be given some time to publicly defend themselves before the ban takes effect? Most especially in the case of an Escort who depends heavily on the boards to conduct their business.
In light of recent events (banned members) I think it would limit speculation etc. and people could make a more accurate judgement on the decision taken.
I know that memers have strong feelings about people accused of "cheating" the system and understand that fully.

Just a thought

Well, we wouldn't ban anyone unless we were sure, and trust me; we get enough phone calls from guilty parties to try and explain themselves after these sorts of events anyway. Many phone calls.

[SR71]

In my opinion the more serious charge is allowing access to our private forum to clients and other escorts. This has been proved, has it not?

Exactly. In any situation this charge alone would be enough to grant a ban for any escort.

I understand your concerns, but Sam mentioned someone else/banned user accessed her account. Does this mean she is guilty? Why didn't EI give a new user account? Are some popular escorts trying to get her banned?

Public/private forums, the information is there to see/shown to anyone, if there was access. So by looking at it and saying/showing this information to another person, it's wrong?

Lucy, with all due respect, I don't want to argue with you because I'm not good in arguments but why start this thread>> https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...ad.php?t=78647, by saying ''Are escorts requesting bans now?''.

On post number 4, you said ''you didn't notice the other thread'', so why/how did you come to a theory that Patty is looking for a 'self-ban', if you didn't know about this thread >> https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...ad.php?t=78646, even though you admit on the post having not seen the second thread I mentioned?

[samlad]

I haven't seen any proof. This is what Samlad posted.



Who is the 'someone', and where were they quoting content from the private forum?
What activity 'ceased'?
What banned users are accessing her account, and how does E-I know that, unless they are in the room with them at the time?

Call me naive if you like, but this doesn't add up. I have met Patty and I think she is a very genuine person,
and I'm not some gullible young fella looking for brownie points.

I can understand that you're not satisfied with the outcome of this situation, but it doesn't change the fact that Patty's profile had a number of major issues. As for proof, I've already outlined the details, and it would be silly of me to get into the particulars. Why educate people on how to evade detection?

I would say that if she was genuine in your eyes, that's up to you. I just think she's a good service provider if that's the case. I am genuinely sorry that you are disappointed (or furious), but no everyone is what they seem to be.

[wolfie]

I wonder if anything will crawl out from under a rock to try and defend these sharp practices.

That quite frankly is an outrageous statement