Patty

[saoirsemac]

It's less than 5% I would say actually.

will we say 7.5% lol meet u half way lol

[Lucy Chambers]

One would wonder why certain ladies would be worried about this.

One would also wonder how a client became so convinced of this. it isn't only the ladies who protest too much.

[Lucy Chambers]

just fyi our private forums did not discuss cindy banning more than shock of it!
there was no bad mouthing done
she made a very silly mistake thats it! and deserved her banning

despite what all ye boys think we are not jealous little escorts

we have our buisness to worry and care about thanks!

It isn't those posts that have been leaked. We are under no obligation to discuss our forum here. Far too many clients has access to it already.

[samlad]

One would also wonder how a client became so convinced of this. it isn't only the ladies who protest too much.

I can understand that people want a 'definate'. We can't give a definate, not through a lack of evidence, but more so because of the nature of things. Escorts are in a sense actors or actresses. The nature of the business is anonymous. You have to expect a few porkie pies and tall tales to help massage the ego. Quite often (as said before) clients get too involved with escorts and then a great big pile of mess occurs, and then E-I have to mop it up and be held accountable for it.

[Lucy Chambers]

I can understand that people want a 'definate'. We can't give a definate, not through a lack of evidence, but more so because of the nature of things. Escorts are in a sense actors or actresses. The nature of the business is anonymous. You have to expect a few porkie pies and tall tales to help massage the ego. Quite often (as said before) clients get too involved with escorts and then a great big pile of mess occurs, and then E-I have to mop it up and be held accountable for it.

Oh, I understand that Sam. I find it highly disturbing that people would think that any escort would try and get another banned, but let's face it. That's the only petty thing left to think. Accepting there was a problem is obviously too hard to take for some, and I don't think we should have our forum tiers exposed to satisfy anyones curiosity.

[samlad]

Oh, I understand that Sam. I find it highly disturbing that people would think that any escort would try and get another banned, but let's face it. That's the only petty thing left to think. Accepting there was a problem is obviously too hard to take for some, and I don't think we should have our forum tiers exposed to satisfy anyones curiosity.

I agree. I think there has been more than enough explanation and there is a simple choice; believe it or don't believe it. It doesn't change anything anyway.

[Forrest]

I can understand that you're not satisfied with the outcome of this situation, but it doesn't change the fact that Patty's profile had a number of major issues. As for proof, I've already outlined the details, and it would be silly of me to get into the particulars. Why educate people on how to evade detection?

I would say that if she was genuine in your eyes, that's up to you. I just think she's a good service provider if that's the case. I am genuinely sorry that you are disappointed (or furious), but no everyone is what they seem to be.

I am not looking for you to 'educate' anyone on how to evade detection.
You could pm me the answers, unless you don't trust me either. Then again, who can anyone on the internet really trust.?

I asked some other questions and I haven't received a reply.

I cannot find a profile for Sweet Carol, but I can see Carol Massage, who is still getting reviews. Is this who you mean

I also added a question about Master69, but you answered my initial one at the same time as I was editing it.

[samlad]

I am not looking for you to 'educate' anyone on how to evade detection.
You could pm me the answers, unless you don't trust me either. Then again, who can anyone on the internet really trust.?

I asked some other questions and I haven't received a reply.

Sweet Carol: https://www.escort-ireland.com/18103...sh-escort.html

The reviews are suspended as they are duplicate.

Quite surprisingly, her pictures have suddenly 'vanished' since this investigation, however I did take the liberty of taking a screen shot:



For obvious reasons, I won't include the verification picture.

[UKHeather]

Ah yeah, but they can still advertise, EI will still take their adverts, and say we don' want to ruin their lively hood. I watch a lot Scooby Doo episodes as well.!

Whats the alternative? They would just make a new profile and get access to the private section again.

[UKHeather]

That quite frankly is an outrageous statement

It's also an ironic one considering he had his own rock to crawl out from when he was a wannabe pimp. I was offered 'accommodation' from him. He didnt say outright that it was in exchange for sex but that's definitely what was implied. I already knew about him from other girls so I didn't bother getting back to him. I have kept this under my hat for a long long time but frankly I am sick of seeing swamp dwellers on these boards acting all outraged at the actions of others.