Infractions. Should things be changed?

[An don]

I've been threatened when I was reporting fake pict a couple of months ago indirectly by an important mod..I would like this mod to recognise it,at least by pm,cause public would not be so easy I suppose...

She never got to tell us .

[kelso]

Well to be honest fella I do not care what you think of me!
I do start threads some good, many poor!
I do not need you speaking for my intentions when posting thanks!
I am entitled to raise any issue I want I believe despite what you and Doozer think!
Thanks for your opinion and give it all the thought it deserves!

another row involving danny?!! who would have guessed!!!

[dannyboy10]

In fairness I did overreact to Forrest he was making some valid points. (Sorry about that!)

No row here, just posed a question.

I think today will answer it!

[dr love]

In fairness I did overreact to Forrest he was making some valid points. (Sorry about that!)

No row here, just posed a question.

I think today will answer it!

Sincerely hope so .: doc
Answer to question that is

[An don]

With regards to the infraction appeals process i dont really know how it works. In my own situation infractions are issued based on a moderators interpretation of the offense and it very hard to get them to back track.

But i will tell you that i had two profile warnings reversed by pming Patricia. Perhaps that would be the way to go.

[jayf1]

I wonder has Mammy ever thought of doing away with the boards entirely, and just keeping the site as advertising pages for the escorts...

you must be joking. sites are listed on most search engines from the amount of traffic they have and i'm sure e-i is listed high up there because of the amount of traffic that the fourms create doing away with the fourms would do more harm than good as most posters would go to another site that has fourms and then that site would become listed higher than e-i and i'm sure that e-i site owner would not be happy about that.