Loss of functions for banned escorts

[beautyaddict]

I wish to raise the issue of banned escorts and the impact of this on them . As I understand it currently they lose PM function and may but I am not certain lose access to private forum along with not being able to post on forums.

i believe that if the ban is for an issue related to fights/slander and such like on the forum then the loss of posting on the forum is sufficient punishment. It stops the fight breaking out again and the offensive issue cannot be publicly aired therefore the ban on forum posting achieves this .

The loss of PM is a harsh punishment that achieves no real purpose.Indeed by loss of PM function, it can damage an escort and an unintended consequence put more risk into their situation. For members a full ban is fine but I think the site should not remove PM function from escorts who are banned .

I am aware of the possibility of a feud erupting around this. I want to stick to principles not personalities .

Indeed if the site adjust the ban it may not be retrospective , for those for whom English not first language this means that the change will not affect those who have already been banned , no offence intended here BTW . I hope it will take current bans into account BTW.
Please do not start a feud/war here on this . The tribes know who they are.

[beautyaddict]

Never knew there would be any conflict between escorts and their tribal alliances.
I would have thought all escorts looked out for each other how naive I am so.

Well there are some challenges , but I prefer for this not to be the topic but given previous events trying to stop any arguments.

I have made this poll private BTW

[westerner04]

Let the escorts have this out with the admin. They’re paying for this site, punters aren’t. We should stay out of it.

[beautyaddict]

You may have a point there but it has gone nowhere so far. If it stays civil it should be fine, sorry this response to western 04

[beautyaddict]

I always try and look out for the escorts I like and have become very fond of.
I would imagine the majority of the clients/punters here do just the same.

Can you guys maybe stay on topic here please, this issue of PM loss for a banned escort is a serious issue , the aspect your on is not poll related if you dont mind thanks, otherwise the actual issue will be lost .

[beautyaddict]

Well if an escort is slandering another escort in order for them to lose clients/business then maybe they deserve to not be able to avail of PM's to lose out on business also.

There are many things happening here , PM system can be used by members in shall we say an interesting way also. Bans have occurred due to a massive fight on the forum where passions run to say the least high . Often this is heat of the moment stuff as the red mist descends and I suspect is regretted in the cold light of day. If that person cannot post on forums that is solved. This is what I am trying to address.

[philipkntz]

Members that abuse the forums should face a forum ban. Members that abuse the PM system should be banned from using PM. It shouldn't matter whether the member is an escort or a client. Remember it's clients money that is paying the advertising fee and clients should be able to PM advertisers.
Now, is it the problem that the site is incapable of enforcing separate bans?

[AlessandraFan]

I wish to raise the issue of banned escorts and the impact of this on them . As I understand it currently they lose PM function and may but I am not certain lose access to private forum along with not being able to post on forums.

i believe that if the ban is for an issue related to fights/slander and such like on the forum then the loss of posting on the forum is sufficient punishment. It stops the fight breaking out again and the offensive issue cannot be publicly aired therefore the ban on forum posting achieves this .

The loss of PM is a harsh punishment that achieves no real purpose.Indeed by loss of PM function, it can damage an escort and an unintended consequence put more risk into their situation. For members a full ban is fine but I think the site should not remove PM function from escorts who are banned .

I am aware of the possibility of a feud erupting around this. I want to stick to principles not personalities .

Indeed if the site adjust the ban it may not be retrospective , for those for whom English not first language this means that the change will not affect those who have already been banned , no offence intended here BTW . I hope it will take current bans into account BTW.
Please do not start a feud/war here on this . The tribes know who they are.

Howdy hoss,

Ah the mythical Avalon, the escort's forum, where all the girls provocatively saunter around in expensive lingerie, fulsome flowing horsehair tails streaming from buttplugs and swishing behind them.

*le sigh*
*le swoon*

Did you ever see that episode of The Simpsons where Homer swerves to avoid a deer and crashes and ends up in quicksand and reaches his hands down to pull his legs out and they get stuck so he reaches his head down to pull his hands out and ... yeah ...

I'm in agreement with Westerner here, best not get yourself stuck in the quicksand.
But seeing as you've already opened this particular can of worms I might as well have a nibble.

Have you considered that some banned escorts may not be willing to let a simple forum ban get in the way of a good shit throwing session when they can communicate via PM with their minions and stoke the fire from a distance?
Or that any escort who has enough time on their hands to readily engage in skirmishes with other escorts in general chat must not really be that busy with their PMs to begin with.
I won't pretend to know escort politics and won't presume to tell the mods their jobs in that regards.

I know where you're coming from though.


Edit : For future reference, when you are trying to make a poll principled rather than personal it's best to hide the information on who voted which way. Bitch

[beautyaddict]

Members that abuse the forums should face a forum ban. Members that abuse the PM system should be banned from using PM. It shouldn't matter whether the member is an escort or a client. Remember it's clients money that is paying the advertising fee and clients should be able to PM advertisers.
Now, is it the problem that the site is incapable of enforcing separate bans?

It may well be that it is a technical issue that the system can only enforce a blanket ban and cant distinguish between members and escorts .. On PM and members really do not want to go there as if one understands certain things it is a pandoras box best not make this public as i recently discovered.

[beautyaddict]

Howdy hoss,

Ah the mythical Avalon, the escort's forum, where all the girls provocatively saunter around in expensive lingerie, fulsome flowing horsehair tails streaming from buttplugs and swishing behind them.

*le sigh*
*le swoon*

Did you ever see that episode of The Simpsons where Homer swerves to avoid a deer and crashes and ends up in quicksand and reaches his hands down to pull his legs out and they get stuck so he reaches his head down to pull his hands out and ... yeah ...

I'm in agreement with Westerner here, best not get yourself stuck in the quicksand.
But seeing as you've already opened this particular can of worms I might as well have a nibble.

Have you considered that some banned escorts may not be willing to let a simple forum ban get in the way of a good shit throwing session when they can communicate via PM with their minions and stoke the fire from a distance?
Or that any escort who has enough time on their hands to readily engage in skirmishes with other escorts in general chat must not really be that busy with their PMs to begin with.
I won't pretend to know escort politics and won't presume to tell the mods their jobs in that regards.

I know where you're coming from though.


Edit : For future reference, when you are trying to make a poll principled rather than personal it's best to hide the information on who voted which way. Bitch

I know it is a can of worms AF I expect some flak on this, but for me its a welfare/safety issue. Simpsons no not seen . As to Pm being used to stoke fires I guess its a possibility for sure.

I did make the poll private , I ticked that box for that very reason !!!