Loss of functions for banned escorts

[beautyaddict]

I wish to raise the issue of banned escorts and the impact of this on them . As I understand it currently they lose PM function and may but I am not certain lose access to private forum along with not being able to post on forums.

i believe that if the ban is for an issue related to fights/slander and such like on the forum then the loss of posting on the forum is sufficient punishment. It stops the fight breaking out again and the offensive issue cannot be publicly aired therefore the ban on forum posting achieves this .

The loss of PM is a harsh punishment that achieves no real purpose.Indeed by loss of PM function, it can damage an escort and an unintended consequence put more risk into their situation. For members a full ban is fine but I think the site should not remove PM function from escorts who are banned .

I am aware of the possibility of a feud erupting around this. I want to stick to principles not personalities .

Indeed if the site adjust the ban it may not be retrospective , for those for whom English not first language this means that the change will not affect those who have already been banned , no offence intended here BTW . I hope it will take current bans into account BTW.
Please do not start a feud/war here on this . The tribes know who they are.

[AlessandraFan]

I wish to raise the issue of banned escorts and the impact of this on them . As I understand it currently they lose PM function and may but I am not certain lose access to private forum along with not being able to post on forums.

i believe that if the ban is for an issue related to fights/slander and such like on the forum then the loss of posting on the forum is sufficient punishment. It stops the fight breaking out again and the offensive issue cannot be publicly aired therefore the ban on forum posting achieves this .

The loss of PM is a harsh punishment that achieves no real purpose.Indeed by loss of PM function, it can damage an escort and an unintended consequence put more risk into their situation. For members a full ban is fine but I think the site should not remove PM function from escorts who are banned .

I am aware of the possibility of a feud erupting around this. I want to stick to principles not personalities .

Indeed if the site adjust the ban it may not be retrospective , for those for whom English not first language this means that the change will not affect those who have already been banned , no offence intended here BTW . I hope it will take current bans into account BTW.
Please do not start a feud/war here on this . The tribes know who they are.

Howdy hoss,

Ah the mythical Avalon, the escort's forum, where all the girls provocatively saunter around in expensive lingerie, fulsome flowing horsehair tails streaming from buttplugs and swishing behind them.

*le sigh*
*le swoon*

Did you ever see that episode of The Simpsons where Homer swerves to avoid a deer and crashes and ends up in quicksand and reaches his hands down to pull his legs out and they get stuck so he reaches his head down to pull his hands out and ... yeah ...

I'm in agreement with Westerner here, best not get yourself stuck in the quicksand.
But seeing as you've already opened this particular can of worms I might as well have a nibble.

Have you considered that some banned escorts may not be willing to let a simple forum ban get in the way of a good shit throwing session when they can communicate via PM with their minions and stoke the fire from a distance?
Or that any escort who has enough time on their hands to readily engage in skirmishes with other escorts in general chat must not really be that busy with their PMs to begin with.
I won't pretend to know escort politics and won't presume to tell the mods their jobs in that regards.

I know where you're coming from though.


Edit : For future reference, when you are trying to make a poll principled rather than personal it's best to hide the information on who voted which way. Bitch

[beautyaddict]

Howdy hoss,

Ah the mythical Avalon, the escort's forum, where all the girls provocatively saunter around in expensive lingerie, fulsome flowing horsehair tails streaming from buttplugs and swishing behind them.

*le sigh*
*le swoon*

Did you ever see that episode of The Simpsons where Homer swerves to avoid a deer and crashes and ends up in quicksand and reaches his hands down to pull his legs out and they get stuck so he reaches his head down to pull his hands out and ... yeah ...

I'm in agreement with Westerner here, best not get yourself stuck in the quicksand.
But seeing as you've already opened this particular can of worms I might as well have a nibble.

Have you considered that some banned escorts may not be willing to let a simple forum ban get in the way of a good shit throwing session when they can communicate via PM with their minions and stoke the fire from a distance?
Or that any escort who has enough time on their hands to readily engage in skirmishes with other escorts in general chat must not really be that busy with their PMs to begin with.
I won't pretend to know escort politics and won't presume to tell the mods their jobs in that regards.

I know where you're coming from though.


Edit : For future reference, when you are trying to make a poll principled rather than personal it's best to hide the information on who voted which way. Bitch

I know it is a can of worms AF I expect some flak on this, but for me its a welfare/safety issue. Simpsons no not seen . As to Pm being used to stoke fires I guess its a possibility for sure.

I did make the poll private , I ticked that box for that very reason !!!

[WatWatWat]

So is this thread going to have any pictures or what?

[beautyaddict]

So is this thread going to have any pictures or what?

You know your a legend I am really loving your posts BTW

[AlessandraFan]

So is this thread going to have any pictures or what?

[AlessandraFan]

I know it is a can of worms AF I expect some flak on this, but for me its a welfare/safety issue. Simpsons no not seen . As to Pm being used to stoke fires I guess its a possibility for sure.

I did make the poll private , I ticked that box for that very reason !!!

Found the clip.
The backstory is a bit different than I remember it.
On the plus side they find Cortez.




Oh sorry, you did make the poll private.
I just saw the 'View poll results' button and made a presumption.

[DonaldTramp]

I wish to raise the issue of banned escorts and the impact of this on them . As I understand it currently they lose PM function and may but I am not certain lose access to private forum along with not being able to post on forums.

i believe that if the ban is for an issue related to fights/slander and such like on the forum then the loss of posting on the forum is sufficient punishment. It stops the fight breaking out again and the offensive issue cannot be publicly aired therefore the ban on forum posting achieves this .

The loss of PM is a harsh punishment that achieves no real purpose.Indeed by loss of PM function, it can damage an escort and an unintended consequence put more risk into their situation. For members a full ban is fine but I think the site should not remove PM function from escorts who are banned .

I am aware of the possibility of a feud erupting around this. I want to stick to principles not personalities .

Indeed if the site adjust the ban it may not be retrospective , for those for whom English not first language this means that the change will not affect those who have already been banned , no offence intended here BTW . I hope it will take current bans into account BTW.
Please do not start a feud/war here on this . The tribes know who they are.

Which tribe do you belong to?
Not an illegal Mexican hopefully!

[DonaldTramp]

As you sow so shall you reap!

[beautyaddict]

One of my concerns about me doing this poll is I am aware of a few imbibes who will vote no just to get to me , being unable to see the important issue at hand as in escort welfare and safety. says more about them than me really.