Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality

[Clyde]

The Sweet one will be online in approximately 50 minutes...

God help us ..... lol well done ladies

[JAMESCORK]

Which girls were allowed into the hearing? I presume Rachel was one. Who accompanied her? I am sure the girls will provide us with details in due course.

Rachel and Stephanie.

Both girls put in many hours preparing for this one shot.... I believe many helped with opinions and advice. Sam was also instrumental in background help.

Fair play to all....

[dob]

Rachel and Stephanie.

Both girls put in many hours preparing for this one shot.... I believe many helped with opinions and advice. Sam was also instrumental in background help.

Fair play to all....

Well done to Rachel and Stephanie for getting stuck in. I read earlier that there was no record of this meeting, perhaps the ladies could do their own report and use it should the committee shaft them and ignore what they said.

[Zoidberg]

Well done to Rachel and Stephanie for getting stuck in. I read earlier that there was no record of this meeting, perhaps the ladies could do their own report and use it should the committee shaft them and ignore what they said.

I'd guess that there will be no public records of this meeting bar maybe some minutes so as to keep the identity of the women private. I doubt it was done to shaft anyone, because Rachel and Stephanie probably would not of attended if their real names and ID's were to be made public.

[The Equalizer]

That seems a bit snakey, maybe the need for anonymity for the escorts was used against them

Then again, "snakey" is a perfect term to describe the conduct of the JOC (as well as the conduct of Ruhama and TORL) to date.

To be honest, I find it a coincidence that for the one JOC Meeting where Independent Sex Workers were afforded the opportunity to put forth testimony which outlines the negative implications of Swedish-style Legislation (and the negative consequences it will impose upon those whom it supposedly "protects"), the JOC suddenly feels there is no need to document and archive the proceedings.

[Rachel Divine]

If the meeting was done in private was on our request. Respect our privacy and choice, stop moaning about it ... !

The Committee members took notes , also we have been told they will look at other models and ask how it works in different countries, different laws... such as New Zealand...

Was a great experince and we put very good points across. to the Committee..

[dob]

If the meeting was done in private was on our request. Respect our privacy and choice, stop moaning about it ... !

The Committee members took notes , also we have been told they will look at other models and ask how it works in different countries, different laws... such as New Zealand...

Was a great experince and we put very good points across. to the Committee..

Fair play to you for repressenting

The worry some here have is that if it isn't written in the record, it wasn't said

[Rocker123]

If the meeting was done in private was on our request. Respect our privacy and choice, stop moaning about it ... !

The Committee members took notes , also we have been told they will look at other models and ask how it works in different countries, different laws... such as New Zealand...

Was a great experince and we put very good points across. to the Committee..

That is good to know. We didn't know the reason so thanks for clearing that up for us.

Well done! You two have done a brilliant job!

[Zoidberg]

There is just one negative issue in relation to today's JOC Meeting; Today's Meeting Was Not Recorded Or Otherwise Publicized.

where does it say that the committee did not record what was said? The meeting was in private, that is different from not recording the meeting. A company board meeting is in private but you can be rest assured it's recorded

[Bumble]

Fair play to ye, it cant be easy speaking to a bunch of suits.