rule change

[LuckyLu]

with most of the girls now having fake pictures on E-I and nothing being done about it only being verified, is it not time to allow the client to leave a review even if he stays, afterall once money is paid its all good for E-I so should be at least considered

The rule was not there to let them off without the unfavorable review being published.
The rule was there to encourage the correct behaviour.

Not the person in the pictures? - please walk away.
Leave review.
We will publish it.

[MidlifeCrisis]

The rule was not there to let them off without the unfavorable review being published.
The rule was there to encourage the correct behaviour.

Not the person in the pictures? - please walk away.
Leave review.
We will publish it.

I never quite see the logic in this.

Reviews are attached to a profile - not a person. If someone experiences bait and switch on a profile, then a review that indicates that you may walk into bait and switch if you book on the profile is useful.

I have never walked, and never experienced bait and switch, but I have several times been uncertain in the first few minutes whether itt was the person in the photos - girls frequently look very different, especially those whose faces are concealed in the pictures. It is easy to imagine someone only being certain whether it was the girl pictured when they get a chance to look at the profile again later.

I don't see the down side of allowing reviews when someone stays. Honest escorts wouldn't get hurt, and clients would get helpful warnings.

[justfrank44]

A problem that comes up with reporting fake pics is that. we report the fake, it gets taken down, and then within a few hours the same pics are in use by the same profile again. Why can the mods not keep any eye, Either physically or electronically on the profiles that have already been reported.?