Results 1 to 10 of 101

Thread: Why has this review been allowed??

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WhenLoveComesToTown View Post
    Thats very unfair Taylor and I'm sure Sarah or one of the MODs will have it removed
    But anyone familiar with this site can usually smell a "rat" a mile away so if one slips by the MODs we still know a fake review when we see one!
    I noticed how many positive reviews you have .... & WOW!!
    Awww thankyou Mr. fussy & Whenlovecomestotown. I messaged them to say i wanted it ratted & it got ratted, however it does clearly break the rule, so cnt understand y its up there anyway, ive not had no reply from any of the review moderators, not even a reply back to the PM i sent, seems im being ignored completeley, Im just not important, neither is my business, nor that i pay £90/wk. xxxx


    A TOUCH CAN LAST A MOMENT, BUT A MEMORY LASTS A LIFETIME

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,224
    Reviews
    33

    Default fake review

    I can't believe what i've just read.
    Taylor you are defintely an absolute diamond and one of the best escorts i've ever had the pleasure to meet.
    Friendly . very welcoming , sexy of f ck with a cracking attitude and i have you sitting proudly in my top 3 .
    Anyone else who has had the pleasure would agree and these fake reviews need to be stopped.
    It seems to me the English ladies get more stick than any other. This has to be because they are so good.
    Maxi x

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EnglishTaylor View Post
    Awww thankyou Mr. fussy & Whenlovecomestotown. I messaged them to say i wanted it ratted & it got ratted, however it does clearly break the rule, so cnt understand y its up there anyway, ive not had no reply from any of the review moderators, not even a reply back to the PM i sent, seems im being ignored completeley, Im just not important, neither is my business, nor that i pay £90/wk. xxxx
    Your issue is being discussed and not being ignored. The reviewer says sometime last year which if December puts him within 3 month rule but I feel the rule about stating a time over rides that and he puts a date in 2010 for that which contradicts what he says in review but I am not the deciding mod but that is my opinion and stated it in said discussion.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •