Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Woman pleads guilty to brothel keeping in Cork City

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    From Breaking news ...............
    /04/2010 - 16:52:10
    Significant developments occurred today in a case where a jury of 12 men was sworn in for the trial of a man and two women accused of organising prostitution and keeping brothels in Cork.

    ***************************, pleaded not guilty to 69 counts this morning but later in the afternoon she pleaded guilty to five counts of keeping brothels at 18 Grafton Street and 26 John Street on various dates in 2006 and 2007. ******** cried as she was being re-arraigned. Sentencing in her case was adjourned until May 12.

    The prosecution then indicated that they were entering a nolle prosequi in the case against ******************************, Cork, who had pleaded not guilty to six similar counts.

    Effectively, that means that the Director of Public Prosecutions dropped its prosecution of ****** who now stands cleared of all charges.

    Judge Seán Ó Donnabháin told the 12 men of the jury, “There have been significant developments, huge developments. One defendant pleaded to a number of charges and her case is gone back for sentencing and the state has not gone ahead against another defendant. You can put them out of your mind as if they never existed.

    “The case that started as a trinity is now down to one,” the judge said.

    The one person who now faces trial, commencing at 2 p.m. tomorrow is ********************************, who pleaded not guilty to a total of 69 counts related to the alleged organisation of prostitution and the keeping of brothels at 26 John Street and 18 Grafton Street, Cork, on dates between January 2006 and May 2007.

    cry baby
    Last edited by Westsidex; 19-04-10 at 19:13. Reason: No real names

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,101

    Default

    what about u Seanie u cunt u gambled away the countries fortune on your horrible greedy moronic buddies what about it u cowardly stinking piece of shit I'll find ya ya dopey bastard..
    Last edited by Westsidex; 19-04-10 at 19:10.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default No real names on the site

    Quote Originally Posted by seanief1980 View Post
    From Breaking news ...............
    /04/2010 - 16:52:10
    Significant developments occurred today in a case where a jury of 12 men was sworn in for the trial of a man and two women accused of organising prostitution and keeping brothels in Cork.

    ***************************, pleaded not guilty to 69 counts this morning but later in the afternoon she pleaded guilty to five counts of keeping brothels at 18 Grafton Street and 26 John Street on various dates in 2006 and 2007. ******** cried as she was being re-arraigned. Sentencing in her case was adjourned until May 12.

    The prosecution then indicated that they were entering a nolle prosequi in the case against ******************************, Cork, who had pleaded not guilty to six similar counts.

    Effectively, that means that the Director of Public Prosecutions dropped its prosecution of Healy who now stands cleared of all charges.

    Judge Seán Ó Donnabháin told the 12 men of the jury, “There have been significant developments, huge developments. One defendant pleaded to a number of charges and her case is gone back for sentencing and the state has not gone ahead against another defendant. You can put them out of your mind as if they never existed.

    “The case that started as a trinity is now down to one,” the judge said.

    The one person who now faces trial, commencing at 2 p.m. tomorrow is ********************************, who pleaded not guilty to a total of 69 counts related to the alleged organisation of prostitution and the keeping of brothels at 26 John Street and 18 Grafton Street, Cork, on dates between January 2006 and May 2007.

    cry baby
    this was decided on and agreed on by "The Sweetie" (reg tm). We cant stop ppl from posting links to news but we will edit out any real names in posts. Sorry but those are the rules.

    sounds strange ,i know,
    Westside.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    this was decided on and agreed on by "The Sweetie" (reg tm). We cant stop ppl from posting links to news but we will edit out any real names in posts. Sorry but those are the rules.

    sounds strange ,i know,
    Westside.
    Why leave in the name of the Judge S*** O'D********* in that case m'lud?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladi View Post
    Why leave in the name of the Judge S*** O'D********* in that case m'lud?
    That's a bit different now Vladi, he's not on trial here, he's the judge.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default Ah now

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladi View Post
    Why leave in the name of the Judge S*** O'D********* in that case m'lud?
    no need to go addressing me by my title.
    Westside.

  7. #7

    Cop

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    no need to go addressing me by my title.
    Westside.
    Since you are judge jury and executioner I thought it appropriate to be respectful
    Unlike Murphys, I am bitter

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,110
    Reviews
    49

    Default

    there are worse crimes out there and people getting away with them. This is just because it's revenue. Sad. I feel for the woman

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    838
    Reviews
    1

    Default

    Unfortunately this is becoming more common. You are entitled to know the reason for any search / charge. If the Guards are acting on information received e.g PIMP or disgruntled punter, if you go the court, these witnesses HAVE to appear in court. The fear of going to court to defend a charge seems the most worrying aspect..IT IS NOT, you may and probably will be charged regardless and end up in court based on what you admit to. IF NOT KEEPING A BROTHEL, do not admit to it..... Ask the Garda in charge for the opportunity to speak with a FREE legal representative BEFORE you sign anything.....Again...DON'T sign anything if it is not true.

  10. #10

    Default

    from breaking news

    The trial of a woman on charges of organising prostitution and keeping brothels opened in Cork this afternoon.
    ***************, aged 42, of S*****, W*****, County Cork, has pleaded not guilty to a total of 69 counts related to the alleged organisation of prostitution and the keeping of brothels at 26 John Street and 18 Grafton Street, Cork, on dates between January 2006 and May 2007.

    Prosecution senior counsel ******* told the 12 men of the jury at Cork Circuit Criminal Court that Ms O’*****’s partner, T*** ******, also of Scartbarry, had previously pleaded guilty to the organisation of prostitution and the keeping of brothels at John Street and Grafton Street, Cork.

    Ms F**** SC said the Grafton Street premises (between Oliver Plunkett Street and South Mall) over the Jade Winters adult shop was raided in November 20, 2006.

    Ms F****** said: "A number of covert cameras were found in rooms used for prostitution, in particular one of the rooms. The covert camera was triggered on by a person working in the sex shop down stairs. Covert cameras were found in electrical plugs in the wall and that sort of thing.

    "In a raid at the premises at Scartbarry where Mr L****** and Ms O’***** reside - computer equipment was found. The State will say the evidence demonstrates from these covert cameras a live feed that could be relayed to what was occurring in these rooms where the business of prostitution was being conducted," Ms F***** said.

    The senior counsel said: "A particular list demonstrated how the spoils of prostitution were being divided. One of the lists you will see, has each of the girls working at any given time. Half of what they earned went to what was described as ‘boss’, half went to themselves."

    *** ***** senior counsel for Ms O’L**** said the defence was prepared to accept that the premises were brothels and the prosecution did not need to prove this.

    Uncontested statements from five customers and five prostitutes were read into evidence without the parties being identified.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •