How many of you guys actually read that in its entirety... Be honest now...
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
How many of you guys actually read that in its entirety... Be honest now...
funlover12 (03-09-15)
Originally Posted by JAMESCORK
How many of you guys actually read that in its entirety... Be honest now...
I read it with the voice of Leela from Futurama in my head.
Banned User
Some good points there LVT.
Especially for us to stop whining so they can fix the actual escort issues are you are paying to advertise.
Theres really no easy way to verify pictures.
You would just hope that when the punter opens the door and its clearly not her, he just walks away and reports it.
Sadly, Mr Willy takes over and that doesn't always happen
As I said before, I'm not sure how the law works, but I do know that all betting companies demand photo id and proof of address. photo id is a scanned copy of passport and driving license
x
Ladyvonteese (04-09-15)
I read about 7 words before my attention started to drift, what happened in the end?? Then someone decides to reply with quote!!! Do you know how difficult it is to scroll through this excuse for a website since it was relaunched? I know where I would like to launch it to...
That's not a skirt girl that's a sawn-off shotgun and I can only hope you've got it aimed at me.
casman (03-09-15), Ladyvonteese (04-09-15)
It's a little disconcerting that so many people on this site chose to see a problem in relation to the person involved rather than seeing the problem for what it is.
Last edited by Jiberjabber; 03-09-15 at 22:53. Reason: god damn you temporary dyslexia, god damn you!!
funlover12 (03-09-15), xagerate (03-09-15)
The question is this....
Does the sign up criteria need changing ?
If someone is sad or sick enough to do what was done to Rachel they will do it anyway.
Whether it is after 10 posts or 100 posts or 10 days or 100 days it will happen if the person is determined.
Ladyvonteese (04-09-15)
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
the worse thing they ever did was to say anything about it, because any one who has met a person before when they see a photo they will know if the photo is real, but anyone who doesnt know its the same person doesnt know so therefore if everyone who HAS met that person and knows the photo to be real comments that its is so bad and terrible then they are whether they realise it or not comfirming that the photo is real, then the question becomes if it was real and they just confirmed it was was why would they do that unless they are not very smart or secretly want to confirm it? there are two possibilities then, the people who were saying "oh thats terrible" have never met her, or they are on the side of the person who posted it! and the third possibility...they are not very smart..
Last edited by funlover12; 03-09-15 at 23:17.
Agreed, it's a simple question, no need to bias your answer based on the people involved.
I believe it needs changing. LVT also believed the same thing two days ago. Would you have agreed with her then too?
What makes u think they did not?How many of you guys actually read that in its entirety... Be honest now...
casman (03-09-15), Ladyvonteese (04-09-15)
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
once I realised yet again (after seconds) there was once again no proof reading involved, my feet were pointing towards the door, but foolishly decided again to give benefit of the doubt only to have it thrown back in my faceHow many of you guys actually read that in its entirety... Be honest now...
needs summary..
it reads like a deranged person in the middle of a break down would write
Last edited by funlover12; 03-09-15 at 23:00. Reason: ...and obviously a complete re-write
Reply With Quote
