Originally Posted by
MrFussy
Let's recap...we already have a rule about reviews greater than 3 months old...so if a person puts in a date of today but states in review....I saw this girl on her last visit <insert 3, 4, 5, 6....months> or <can't remember the date but was last visit>...as far as I am concerned it should be rejected based on the rule that already exists, this is not happening.
You cannot get rid of the human element, all I am saying is that the system should be revampted (as was agreed), rules enforced, and anyone involved in doing the reviews should be independant i.e. cannot have someone who punts and arbitrates......