Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: Value for Money

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,836

    Question Value for Money

    Seeing this on reviews makes me cringe. The client knows how much the appointment will cost before hand so if they're happy with the appointment isn't that what matters most?

    How about an option for 'charges extra' instead? Isn't that more important? The client will know whether to bring more money if the lady adds on lots of extras he's likely to want then.

    Alex x
    He felt her hands slide slowly up his thigh, he couldn't stop himself from growing hard. She caught his eye and in that second he knew: This erotic, sensual Lady is bold if she is anything. She would be upto mischief in no time...
    Some things never change

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to EnglishAlex For This Useful Post:

    doodlebug (30-03-12), LaBelleThatcher (30-03-12), mer (30-03-12), Shirley Joy (30-03-12)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Noooo, ladies aren't supposed to start price threads, what are ye thinking Alex, it's just going to give the cheap asses a platform to bitch

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    LET'S GET IT OOOOOOOOWWWWNNNN!!!!!


  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    EnglishAlex (30-03-12), mer (30-03-12)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    Noooo, ladies aren't supposed to start price threads, what are ye thinking Alex, it's just going to give the cheap asses a platform to bitch
    They can bitch all they want. Bring. It. On

    People can charge what they want, but this 'value for money' bullshit winds me up. An appointment with a sexy lady is a luxury! Surely the reviews in themselves tell you whether the lady is value for money or not? If the lady was crap at her job and charging a fortune then she'd have a load of negative reviews.
    He felt her hands slide slowly up his thigh, he couldn't stop himself from growing hard. She caught his eye and in that second he knew: This erotic, sensual Lady is bold if she is anything. She would be upto mischief in no time...
    Some things never change

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to EnglishAlex For This Useful Post:

    Banjaxed (30-03-12), LaBelleThatcher (30-03-12), mer (30-03-12)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,309
    Reviews
    1

    Default

    Moan, moan, moan.....have you seen how much X is charging for an hour these days!? Fucking hell, she should be glad of any at all....moan...moan...moan...Y can do it for half the price like...moan..whinge
    Last edited by Banjaxed; 30-03-12 at 12:15.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Banjaxed For This Useful Post:

    LaBelleThatcher (30-03-12)

  10. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EnglishAlex View Post
    Seeing this on reviews makes me cringe. The client knows how much the appointment will cost before hand so if they're happy with the appointment isn't that what matters most?

    How about an option for 'charges extra' instead? Isn't that more important? The client will know whether to bring more money if the lady adds on lots of extras he's likely to want then.

    Alex x
    "Value for Money" is never a term I would use but I can see the meaning behind its mention. Some escorts give the punter better thrills/service for his buck than others. Some give great service and are total hunis even though they do not charge big bucks... is this possible what is meant as "value for money"

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to JAMESCORK For This Useful Post:

    very shy guy (30-03-12)

  12. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    "Value for Money" is never a term I would use but I can see the meaning behind its mention. Some escorts give the punter better thrills/service for his buck than others. Some give great service and are total hunis even though they do not charge big bucks... is this possible what is meant as "value for money"
    Value, much like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It is a very crass thing to label another in such a way.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    doodlebug (30-03-12), EnglishAlex (30-03-12), gambor (30-03-12), LaBelleThatcher (30-03-12), Sexy_Jessica (30-03-12)

  14. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    I think it would not do any harm to just delete the option. It does not add anything, as the content tells you if you are going to get what you want or not. Surely no one would say they would go back if they did not feel their money was well spent? There is already a section for extras, so no other representation is needed for that either.

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Curvaceous Kate For This Useful Post:

    EnglishAlex (30-03-12), LaBelleThatcher (30-03-12), very shy guy (30-03-12)

  16. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Value, much like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It is a very crass thing to label another in such a way.
    I know what ya mean... I personally dont like the term "value for money"... its as if one is examining a Tescos shopping receipt. Doesn't the "Overall satisfaction" tickbox cover this anyway...

  17. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to JAMESCORK For This Useful Post:

    Banjaxed (30-03-12), EnglishAlex (30-03-12), LaBelleThatcher (30-03-12), Lucy Chambers (30-03-12), Sexy_Jessica (30-03-12), very shy guy (30-03-12)

  18. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,309
    Reviews
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    I know what ya mean... I personally dont like the term "value for money"... its as if one is examining a Tescos shopping receipt. Doesn't the "Overall satisfaction" tickbox cover this anyway...
    That's exactly what I was thinking. A three course meal at a particular restaurant is "value for money", but I don't think a person is. I don't think any harm is meant by it though, it just happens to be a term in common use. I wouldn't use it, but then again I worry too much and end up putting my foot in it a different way because I was clouded with worry in the first place.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Banjaxed For This Useful Post:

    LaBelleThatcher (30-03-12)

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •