Sometimes we do stupid things

[JAMESCORK]

Hi Dave xx,

I wasn't suggesting that you are 'bowing' to anyone, I was simply quoting Anon's statement re being politically correct.

I also said that I don't see the benefit to anyone bowing down to anyone.

As to "chonies in a bunch" , it is the Cali equivalent of "knickers in a knot/twist" . I was paraphrasing .

Whats a "Cali equivalent "....

[Stephanie]

Whats a "Cali equivalent "....

"Chonies in a bunch" is a California phrase meaning "knickers in a twist" .

I think it has Mexican Spanish origins.
.

[mer]

id love a hug

[Stephanie]

id love a hug

. .

[mer]

. .

awww how sweet

[FuntimeswithU]

In this instance, I think I was entitled to know what the perceived view of my thread was, from behind the scenes.

It gave me an opportunity to try to correct that perception, by making a public apology for any offence I may have caused to escorts.

I saw your original thread - Are you really that thick, that you didn't realise how your comment would be perceived by ladies on the site?

Let me help you out here - You wrote a lurid comment stereo-typing an escorts sense of dress on an escorting site. Suggesting to other readers that when you see someone in a short skirt that you assume they're an escort. You assume too much! I don't know who you've been meeting but I've never met an escort in a short skirt anyway.

I would love to see your face if a few escorts gave you their stereo-typical view of a client.

I saw no mention of stalking when I read the thread - You obviously have an overactive imagination as well! So, think about it, your comment was stupidity of the highest form. Shame the site doesn't award prat of month!

Hope you've learnt a lesson and think with your brain next time.

[FuntimeswithU]

As far as I'm aware it was a topic for discussion on the private escort forum, so you are in a better position than I to say in what context I might have been engaging in 'a kind of stalking'. It surprised and annoyed me to hear that.

I appreciate, Samantha, that you were the only escort to publicly state that you were offended by my thread,
and I responded by saying it wasn't a generalisation, and that I hadn't assumed that the lady was an escort.

I have now apologised, because my original intentions were misconstrued, which was something I hadn't considered beforehand.

How do you know what's discussed in PVT forums?

[anon361]

I saw your original thread - Are you really that thick, that you didn't realise how your comment would be perceived by ladies on the site?

Let me help you out here - You wrote a lurid comment stereo-typing an escorts sense of dress on an escorting site. Suggesting to other readers that when you see someone in a short skirt that you assume they're an escort. You assume too much! I don't know who you've been meeting but I've never met an escort in a short skirt anyway.

I would love to see your face if a few escorts gave you their stereo-typical view of a client.

I saw no mention of stalking when I read the thread - You obviously have an overactive imagination as well! So, think about it, your comment was stupidity of the highest form. Shame the site doesn't award prat of month!

Hope you've learnt a lesson and think with your brain next time.

Sorry, couldn't hear you properly with your tongue stuck so far up a ladies ass, FFS, we have enough ass licker's here without an original opinion so we don't need another one

[FuntimeswithU]

I saw the thread and personally didn't see too much wrong with it, but you are right Forrest we are all different so at the end of the day certain things will offend one and not the other.

Main thing is you're man enough to apologise which i'm sure is appreciated

If you didn't see much wrong with it, then your as daft as he is!

[anon361]

Let me think, who is your single review for? and who is the lady that took offence? and finally who started the thread in the private forum? Please case closed, no point debating with you as your obviously a mindless nitwit that just follows like a good little lap dog