Banned users

[anon361]

On another site where escorts can advertise literally anything (apart from illegal stuff) you'd be surprised at the number of people who've left reviews for the stupid bitches offering unprotected sex. They charge far less than the average lady too which would mean that they're more accessable to clients. The thought of it makes me want to throw my guts up tbh. Dirty stinking scrubbers.

I've been contacted by several people on there who've spent time with these fools and just say I'm busy all the time so I don't ever meet them. Even though I'm in the smallest risk category due to services offered I still dont want to take any chances. Thanks all the same like

Ok rant over

When in the UK I never use that site for that very reason, I generally stick with the same group of ladies I know are safe...

[UKHeather]

Unprotected sex in a committed relationship - absolutely. But we should all be adult enough and have enough cop on to know in other circumstances it's not a risk worth taking, be it a fling or an escort.

Prickly - I can't see anyone maintaining their business on that basis.

Unfortunately not enough people care about the risks. You would be surprised how many men call and ask if BB is available. Also manyt giys try it on during an appointment. I reckon an escort providing BB would do great business thank you very much.
Sad isn't it.

[UKHeather]

I too would like to see BB advertised openly. That way you know who is doing it, escorts and clients alike.
If you ban BB advertising then you really have to ban all other unsafe practices such as OWO
By banning one and not banning others the wrong message is being sent out.

[ChiefHandker]

Am I right in thinking Great Kamilla Adriana has jumped up the rankings to 7th in the top reviewed list since yesterday?

If so, shouldn't that list be a privilege, and not earned by such... tactics

[samlad]

Unfortunately, we can't pick or choose who goes in the top reviewed list, as the system is set up for the number of reviews.

[Lucy Chambers]

Am I right in thinking Great Kamilla Adriana has jumped up the rankings to 7th in the top reviewed list since yesterday?

If so, shouldn't that list be a privilege, and not earned by such... tactics

You are right. One would wonder when this will stop. A lady already won escort of the month.

[Lucy Chambers]

Unfortunately, we can't pick or choose who goes in the top reviewed list, as the system is set up for the number of reviews.

Sam, you can pick the reviews used. In this case the lady chose not to use her profile, why should she benefit? We all knew who tried to do this, why are they still benefitting?

[samlad]

Sam, you can puck the reviews used. In this case the lady chose not to use her profile, why should she benefit?

And how would I determine which ones to use or not? I won't be removing the ratted reviews, that's a given.

[Lucy Chambers]

And how would I determine which ones to use or not? I won't be removing the ratted reviews, that's a given.

You use all of them Sam.

I have worked here for a year. I have also worked my arse off, and gained far worse comment than the other dying swan. Should I take responsibility? Of course not.

[samlad]

I will need to talk to the techies and see what can be done. I agree that she shouldn't be on the list (nor Cindy Forever), and we'll need to see what can be done.