Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 126

Thread: Gold Advertiser Status

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    969
    Reviews
    2

    Default

    I'm in favour of a system that identifies how long an escort is advertising, some clients will favour the new girls and some will go for the tried & tested. Also I would like to see a system where we could see all photos used by a lady in the last year.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,042
    Blog Entries
    5
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sweet Rachel View Post
    Could we debate this, now some of the posters who ruined this thread are no longer on the forum?
    Havent read all the thread, but i would imagine the same problem arises, by what criteria do escorts get awarded the golden award. As this was originally posted over a year ago i presume the EI 'think tank' still havent come up with a solution.
    Perhaps members with over say,10 reviews would be allowed to enter a list of say 15/20 escorts they feel qualify and the votes counted

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    10,794
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    well if the shambles that is the verified pics thing is anything to go by just leave it out

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    I think forum use should be a contributing factor and anyone getting gold status should get a 10% discount on their advertising costs, as that would be a bonus worth getting!

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Curvaceous Kate For This Useful Post:

    Amanda Babe (09-12-12), Doll 34 DD (11-12-12), Svetlana (09-12-12)

  6. #65
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mellors View Post
    Havent read all the thread, but i would imagine the same problem arises, by what criteria do escorts get awarded the golden award. As this was originally posted over a year ago i presume the EI 'think tank' still havent come up with a solution.
    Perhaps members with over say,10 reviews would be allowed to enter a list of say 15/20 escorts they feel qualify and the votes counted
    Since reviews can't be trusted this would be a big NO from me.

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to UKHeather For This Useful Post:

    funlover12 (09-12-12), Naughtynatalie (09-12-12), Shirley Joy (09-12-12)

  8. #66
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    988
    Reviews
    27

    Default

    From what i gather about this whole thread is it boils down to status & experiences to most accurately identify a good or "gold" escort (Platinum, gold, silver, elite etc etc).

    I don't see it as any benefit to me to know that an escort is "gold" escort just because they have advertised the longest etc (hence i don't see it as a benefit to the escort coz this isn't the criteria i use to choose that escort)

    When i fancy an experience with an escort i go by a positives system
    1) First things first "verified pics", essential to have but not a clincher in its own right
    2) Allows reviews
    3) Reviews in general positive
    4) I check the reviews (by reviewer) - cross reference etc,,, put more weight in reviews of posters i've learned to trust etc
    5) Check things like location, shower available etc (tend to be some reviews)

    So what i'm getting at is to upgrade the review system (points basis - only visible to E-I staff) where more options in review (drop down options etc) to build up a total in review + reviews from established/more trusted members carry more weight.

    This way the longer a member posts reviews they carry more clout
    Escorts in turn could establish a verified basis if reviewed by members who we know ain't a obvious ratty review (even if not marked as such)

    May be hard to do, i don't know much on IT systems
    Just throwing it out there
    Genuine Panda Bear Punter - Eats Shoots & Leaves

  9. #67
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,042
    Blog Entries
    5
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UKHeather View Post
    Since reviews can't be trusted this would be a big NO from me.
    Good point. Not sure what the stats are, but if there were say 100 reviewers in that criteria, the amount of fake reviews for the same escort(s) would be a small % Just to use you as an example, if 25 reviewers put you on their list , its likely only 1 or 2 may be fake due to the fact a reviewer can only leave one review per escort. the 1or 2 may be reviewers who have more than one poster profile

  10. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    5,309
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mellors View Post
    Havent read all the thread, but i would imagine the same problem arises, by what criteria do escorts get awarded the golden award. As this was originally posted over a year ago i presume the EI 'think tank' still havent come up with a solution.
    Perhaps members with over say,10 reviews would be allowed to enter a list of say 15/20 escorts they feel qualify and the votes counted

    are you mad Mellors? why the heck should forum members have the final say? Jaysus some excellent, well established escorts dont post on these boards at all and you know most forum members/reviewers would be choosing the ladies who pander to them on the boards ...

    dear god abollish this idea before some of these clients get above their station
    Last edited by Naughtynatalie; 09-12-12 at 21:49.

  11. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Naughtynatalie For This Useful Post:

    Deven (10-12-12), diannasweet (09-12-12), Doll 34 DD (11-12-12), Sexy Fernanda (10-12-12), Shirley Joy (09-12-12), UKHeather (09-12-12)

  12. #69
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    5,309
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CurvaceousKate View Post
    I think forum use should be a contributing factor and anyone getting gold status should get a 10% discount on their advertising costs, as that would be a bonus worth getting!
    why should forum use be a factor? Because it suits you? Some woman have been here years and paid their way yet dont feel the need to use the boards and those woman should in no way be penalised.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Naughtynatalie For This Useful Post:

    diannasweet (09-12-12), max california (09-12-12), UKHeather (09-12-12)

  14. #70
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,042
    Blog Entries
    5
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Naughtynatalie View Post
    are you mad Mellors? why the heck should forum members have the final say? Jaysus some excellent, well established escorts dont post on these boards at all and you know most forum members/reviewers would be choosing the ladies who pander to them on the boards ...

    dear god abollish this idea before some of these clients get above their station
    I am actually !!
    But i am well aware that nearly all the best escorts dont have message board ID, and the amount of posters who respond to 'the smoke being blown up your arse ' routine is small and of course they wpould of actually had to meet and reviewed the escort. They still only get one vote for the smoke blowers. Alot of reviewers also dont post so are unlikely to be swayed by bullshit
    Last edited by mellors; 09-12-12 at 22:00.

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mellors For This Useful Post:

    Naughtynatalie (09-12-12), Sexy Fernanda (10-12-12), Shirley Joy (09-12-12)

Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •