Originally Posted by
mark444
Have been reading a number of reviews lately,
from top reviewers, through to newbies.
So what is it that makes a good review?
Is it one that is graphic, confirms the escorts pictures, description and favourites on offer,
or just how the client perceived how the appointment evolved?
What struck me today was a graphic review of one reviewer who stated that the escort
'takes it up the ass'!
So when we 'clients' review, how do/should we review?
Should we do so for ourselves, for the 'client community',
or for the community as a whole, involving both escort and client?
Perhaps not a debate for a Saturday night,
but just interested on the communities perception.
Originally Posted by
pablo_23
While I don;t like reviews which are graphic ( don't write either) I think they might be helpful with confirming if escort does services which she advertises. And if escort gets graphic review it means that she rather doesn't mind - there is an option in their panel, they can choose if they wish to recieve or not sexually explicit reviews
Good thread Mark, as always (regardless of the fact its a Saturday nite!).
I have pondered this issue myself. I always write a review after seeing a girl because I believe in the review system, flawed as it is.
Obviously I can only write from my own perspective and opinion. The E-I review system does allow for an escort to reply/ comment on a review made about her - which I think adds some balance to the system.
I try to be both honest and complimentary in my reviews. I have been immensely helped by the reviews left by other reviwers - so try to do the same.
For objectivity I tend to review under the follwing headings - 1) Physical appearance 2) Personality 3) Professionalism 4) Service 5) Location/aparatment. It sounds very clinical but these are the things that I actually look for in the reviews of others in order to help me decide which lady to see next.
I agree with the others - that there is no call for crude remarks. However, Pablo makes a fair point in his comment above. If the review completely skims over services then it doesn't really give a potential customer an idea of what sevices are really provided and what a said lady excels in. (I have found the services listed boxes not always reliable).
At the end of the day this is about sex. Of course the overall experience is all important but the one common theme of every encounter is sex. And therefore I dont' think reviews that are completely devoid of any sexual connotations are helpful.
However, I do think it is at the disgression of each reviewer how one decides to review and everyone has a different style. The Highwayman does read the reviews before posted - so this should control / prevent overly crude reviews.
"Don't be reckless with other people’s hearts. Don't put up with people who are reckless with yours"