Originally Posted by
Monkeynut
You see this is the problem .... regular posters do not know the all facts ...... and never will and until the true facts of these bannings are opened for inspection, threads like this will always appear on these boards.
Certain people were suspected of writing fake reviews, certain people were suspected of using other people's identities, certain people were suspected of having multiple identities.
Other people lobbied to have these certain people banned and were successful.Who were he lobbyists? Name them. Grow some balls please The 'evidence' that regular posters were given is totally unsafe and would be laughed out of any court - even in Ireland.
Why do you feel you have a right to see private data? More importantly, would you really say you were without bias?
IF certain people were writing fake reviews, using multiple identities and using other peoples identities then yes, the should be banned. BUT first it has to be proved .... and to do that you need sustainable evidence. Regular posters who are interested in this should be allowed to see this evidence but never will be. Regular posters generally dont give a flying fu*k but those with an agenda do.
You have an agenda, no one else. I think maybe you think this is real life, and you have a right to answers. In short, you don't. Only EI do,
Anyway posts like this are better than ones about bloody football ..........
