Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 108

Thread: Three strikes and you are out?

  1. #41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Banjo View Post
    Don't think you're wrong but very difficult to police this. We'd all be placing our trust in the integrity of TR's to book anonymously and do as you say. But that's the problem now as things already are in that we're finding that integrity isn't always forthcoming and trust is not always well placed with TR's.
    Then we have to take complaints seriously. The problem may be down to human nature.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Well, Nick, here are my real thoughts on the situation. I prefer PM bookings, I knw where I am and I like to plan my day. However, I hate pressure. Every client gets the same service, it doesnt matter if they are TR's or not, but the point is, some of the TR's think it does. So my thought is that TR's should undertake to review anonymously. How can they leave a subjective review unless it was anonymous? For example, if I worked for Trip Advisor, and I announced that at the booking time in the hotel I was reviewing, would I get the average experience or the 'a la carte'? Who knows? Well, we would actually if reviewers kept their ID to themselves.

    I am probably going to be hated for these posts but I think it is time someone spoke up.
    You say you prefer bookings by Pm, I agree with you as I prefer to book via Pm. I've done it since day one and I think I've only seen two escorts with whom I haven't booked using the Pm system. It works both ways in my opinion. I like to book well in advance and confirm closer to the day. I've never been left waiting and never let down. I've been very lucky.
    So how should I go about reviewing anonymously ?

    Mathsteacher mentioned being dissappointed by a few escorts who had been positively reviewed by TRs. Why not Pm them about it and ask?
    I think every TR should be answerable to comments if people disagree with the review.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dave1dave For This Useful Post:

    Forrest (21-02-11), hornylimerick (21-02-11)

  4. #43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Forrest View Post
    I almost always request appointments by pm. It is my preferred method, usually done 2-3 days in advance, as I need to plan my days too. I don't state that I am a TR when booking, but it becomes immediately known from my profile when I pm a lady. How can I avoid that, except to have the badge removed from my profile? I have no problem with that anyway, as it means little to me in the overall scheme of things.
    I have not always been a TR, but I see no difference in the way I am treated since I got the badge, and I don't expect to either.
    I think I have good experiences because I choose ladies that have good reputations, and because I treat them with respect, by being clean, courteous, polite....and horny(sometimes)
    I know. Therin is the rub. However I have noticed that you go for repeat appointments with your favourites, surely that is recommendation in itself? I doubt we would see you in the complaint section Forrest.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    Forrest (21-02-11)

  6. #44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    You say you prefer bookings by Pm, I agree with you as I prefer to book via Pm. I've done it since day one and I think I've only seen two escorts with whom I haven't booked using the Pm system. It works both ways in my opinion. I like to book well in advance and confirm closer to the day. I've never been left waiting and never let down. I've been very lucky.
    So how should I go about reviewing anonymously ?

    Mathsteacher mentioned being dissappointed by a few escorts who had been positively reviewed by TRs. Why not Pm them about it and ask?
    I think every TR should be answerable to comments if people disagree with the review.
    Undertake to review those with less than 5 reviews on the telephone and only book repeat or established escort bookings by PM maybe? I don't know, hence the thread, my debate loving friend
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    lonely (21-02-11)

  8. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,920
    Reviews
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    No. I think it should be up for periodical review. I think it should be obligatory to make your appointment anonymously and provide relevant information in your review only.

    Am I wrong?
    To a degree yes! I like to do my bookings by PM where ever possible simply so the escort can see who I am, read my other reviews and look at my references. I feel a lot happier if an escort has an idea who is knocking on her door for the first time and I feel by encouraging her to view my profile she will be a lot happier.

  9. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,051
    Blog Entries
    6
    Reviews
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    Mathsteacher mentioned being dissappointed by a few escorts who had been positively reviewed by TRs. Why not Pm them about it and ask?
    I think every TR should be answerable to comments if people disagree with the review.
    That's a good point Dave, as someone else mentioned that they didn't have as good a time with certain escorts that I had positively reviewed. They didn't specify which ones, and I didn't push it any further. I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with my opinion of an escort, but my review will always be honest, accurate and fair.

    Engaging Personality
    Mesmerising Eyes
    Magnificent Ass
    Adorable Lady
    Sexy, Wicked, Enticing, Erotic, Tease

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Forrest For This Useful Post:

    anon361 (22-02-11)

  11. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    999

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Undertake to review those with less than 5 reviews on the telephone and only book repeat or established escort bookings by PM maybe? I don't know, hence the thread, my debate loving friend
    think if a tr books an escort there is less chance of her double booking
    so i cant see many trusted reviewers booking this way

  12. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,920
    Reviews
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post

    Mathsteacher mentioned being dissappointed by a few escorts who had been positively reviewed by TRs. Why not Pm them about it and ask?
    I think every TR should be answerable to comments if people disagree with the review.

    I have been PM dozens and dozens of times by guys seeking assurance about ladies I have reviewed and Im very careful to state that Im reviewing the lady from MY standpoint. I may elabourate about my preferences and see if they are the same as the guy asking the questions. Im sure other TR's experience the same

  13. #49
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,684
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    13

    Default evidence,please???

    I agree with the thrust of this thread, but it has sown doubt in all TRs reps' ,whos the rotten apple etc? . This thread is all anecdotal,and because of that we have TRs explaining themselves and pleading for their reps ,its akin to the commie witchhunt in the U.S.,. All TRs are GUILTY ,until they Post Here! NOW and prove us otherwise,..very unfair,to the decent guys whos judgement we use and trust..imo
    a thousand kisses deep..

  14. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Undertake to review those with less than 5 reviews on the telephone and only book repeat or established escort bookings by PM maybe? I don't know, hence the thread, my debate loving friend
    Thats a good idea, you might have something there.
    I've just checked my reviews, I've only seen one escort with less than 5 reviews and that was arranged by phone.

    Hmm I'm seeing a pattern. I'm a very cautious punter

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •