Originally Posted by Gaylord
But DNA testing is not 100%, but we rely on this method as part of the evidence gathering process....??
Perhaps the lawyers and judges don't want the competition, which is what lie detector usage would be
GL
Thats very true GL
DNA testing isnt 100% and a lot of time it gets contaminated by bad practce
or the jury are influenced by the CSI effect
As I said teh only credible way is to use fMRI brain mapping, getting a base rate and looking for arousal patterns when found to be evading the truth
Reply With Quote