Business over??????

[Violette]

I think Dianna is entitled to express an observation. That is why we are on the forum. We can discuss problems. As some escorts have said escorting can be quite a lonley profession and I do not think we should censor the felling and observations of somebody with an issue the wish to discuss. Argue with what she has to say not with her right to say it.
If you are being hassled by cheapskate customers there is a simple solution .... Tell them to fuck off until they get the rest of their pocket money!

Where is my post arguing with her right to say what is obviously a personal observation on her and her friends part? She is expressing an observation just as I too am entitled to express an observation about her observation. Not to mention,there is also the private forum to discuss this issue. My only objection to airing what is apparently personal business is we as escorts are already facing shit from cheapskate punters taking the piss, wanting to get their money's worth, now there are escorts complaining about being quiet. Does it take a genius to figure out how this reflects on the already shrinking escort market here in Ireland? We have a private forum for the purpose of discussing just these types of issues, somethings are for public consumption, some things are better discussed amongst ourselves. I personally think this is one of those issues.

[dannyboy10]

Hold on, no one is being censored. We do have a private forum, however.

But she choose not to use the private forum. The posts seemed to me ( I may be wrong. Fearing the Wrath of some of you) were more concerned with the fact that she had posted her observation in public rather than than the subject matter. If she wishes to discuss these matters on a public forum I am merely supporting her right to do so. If you disagree that is ok too. Debate is not personal.

[carlos marvado]

Hold on, no one is being censored. We do have a private forum, however.

Of course you do Lucy, but only escorts can contribute to that forum. Maybe Dianna wanted to invite comment from not just the escorts.

Whilst anybody is entitled to disagree with anything she posts, she should not be badgered for deciding to post something out here rather than in the escort private forum (once it's within the rules). Afterall, we are trying to encourage escorts to feel comfortable about making their contribution on the open forums.

[Mousey]

Where is my post arguing with her right to say what is obviously a personal observation on her and her friends part? She is expressing an observation just as I too am entitled to express an observation about her observation.

May I make an observation? Your observation about her observation observing that her observation was observing that business is poor, and your subsequent observation to that observation, observing that observing chancers might observe, indicates that observations of observations of observations regarding one's observations of an original observation is merely that - an observation.

[dannyboy10]

we as escorts are already facing shit from cheapskate punters taking the piss, wanting to get their money's worth,

Are they not entitled to their moneys worth

[Lucy Chambers]

But she choose not to use the private forum. The posts seemed to me ( I may be wrong. Fearing the Wrath of some of you) were more concerned with the fact that she had posted her observation in public rather than than the subject matter. If she wishes to discuss these matters on a public forum I am merely supporting her right to do so. If you disagree that is ok too. Debate is not personal.

Indeed it isn't, Dannyboy. But if you are going to debate then you must be willing to see both sides, surely? Dianna and Violette have both expressed their opinion, Violette is being jumped on for expressing hers.

[Lucy Chambers]

May I make an observation? Your observation about her observation observing that her observation was observing that business is poor, and your subsequent observation to that observation, observing that observing chancers might observe, indicates that observations of observations of observations regarding one's observations of an original observation is merely that - an observation.

But my observation is that all observations mean nothing, because they are just that, observational

[dannyboy10]

May I make an observation? Your observation about her observation observing that her observation was observing that business is poor, and your subsequent observation to that observation, observing that observing chancers might observe, indicates that observations of observations of observations regarding one's observations of an original observation is merely that - an observation.

That has lighted things for the moment.

[carlos marvado]

May I make an observation? Your observation about her observation observing that her observation was observing that business is poor, and your subsequent observation to that observation, observing that observing chancers might observe, indicates that observations of observations of observations regarding one's observations of an original observation is merely that - an observation.

Mousey, I have you under observation for going off topic.......please observe the rules.

[dannyboy10]

Indeed it isn't, Dannyboy. But if you are going to debate then you must be willing to see both sides, surely? Dianna and Violette have both expressed their opinion, Violette is being jumped on for expressing hers.

I have no intention of jumping on Violetta I just thought Dianna was the one being picked on unfairly. I am not expressing any view on what Dianna is saying merely her right to say it on a public forum if she chooses.