Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Why do they do it

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,300
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Trying to be very objective in this matter, I honestly think the truth is somewhere in the middle.

    James, like any other genuine reviewer had the duty to inform others in his reviews that an escort resembles or not her pictures. On the other hand, Jack is very right to say that any disappointed reviewer should remain nice and objective when he writes that bad review, because escorts can be hurt by too personal comments.

    By no means I am a slim girl myself. Quite the opposite, I am an UK size 16.
    A healthy and shapely size 16, where everything is strong enough to stay in the place it's meant to be.
    Excepting one reference in KK's reviews which was in fact a compliment ("While Karin is a big woman she is also "all" woman and I left very satisfied"), nobody ever wrote in my reviews that I am big / fat / overweight etc ... This is because I never tried to hide that. My photos are always showing the real way I look and nobody that makes a booking with me would expect a slim girl to open the door.

    From this point of view, I understand any punter out there that is disappointed when an escort he visits has a different body type then the one advertised in her photos.

    @ James:
    If you are attracted only by slim & toned girls, why did you stay to complete the booking?
    It was obvious from the moment you have seen the escort at the door if she looks like her pictures or not.
    You are not the submissive shy guy that is afraid to leave at the door, so I really think you must have liked something in this girl, otherwise you would never stayed.
    Your review does not reflect this at all. You need to show the good and the bad in a polite way, in order to be objective, not just the bad.

    @ Jack:
    You tend to visit the better known escorts, unanimously considered genuine and very attractive in their own unique way.
    Because of this, you cannot go easily wrong in your selection.
    But let's assume just for the sake of the argument that you decide to visit a less known escort. Her pics shows a very attractive 29 year old, with a charming smile.
    You arrive to see this escort and a woman with twice as many years awaits you with a sour face, smelling badly, in an apartment that is very dirty.
    I have no doubt you will leave ASAP in this case. But what are going to write in your N/A review? Are going to refer to her as "mature", knowing that mature is also generally considered a lady over 35 years old? Are you going to refer to her as "somehow cold", knowing that the escort didn't make in fact any effort at all to welcome you? And finally, are you going to say that her place was " a little un-tidy", knowing that her place was nothing more then a health hazard?
    I somehow doubt that even you can be so nice if someone would try to con you so badly.
    You would realise that sugar coating the truth may result in many other people getting caught in the same experience and you're going to stick to the facts in your review. Calling a spade ... a spade is sometimes a little difficult to do

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sensual Delights For This Useful Post:

    jacksparrow2010 (14-08-10), Lucy Chambers (14-08-10)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •