I've said this before, more than once, but nothing seems to happen: The system should be set up so it automatically shows who ratted the review. Just as the boards software automatically shows who edited a post. It also shouldn't allow a rat without some sort of comment. Of course, there will always be people who get around that with useless comments like "This Review is believes to be fake", but I think most people will give proper reasons, especially if they know their names will be listed after them.
The difference here is that no one is saying that any of this guy's reviews are real. Maybe someone will, but so far that hasn't happened.
“I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
“All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.
it might be sorted out today
https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...tml#post229167
Never confuse education with intelligence One helps you make a living; the other helps you make a life.
I'm neutral on this one and to be honest I can't see how he could have given Nikky such a review had he seen her, just a question and I know it's a personal one but does Nikky have an inverted nipple? At least on that point it would prove he hadn't seen her, if she has it is his right to leave whatever review he feels no matter how wrong others may feel him to be.. As for the rest of his reviews, how is he any different to this guy, he too only has 3 positive reviews out of his first 13 and nobody is calling to have his reviews ratted , now don't get me wrong, I am not trying to cast any shadow as to the veracity of peters reviews, just giving a comparison..
Its not as if were talking about national security here QPH, the hurdles to overcome whether good or bad are listed above for all to see, the point i'm making is if a review is ratted which of the above is it ? and who decided ? this would give the escort or client a direct name to deal with to sort the matter out and enable her/him to respond to which review has been questioned and why.
Anti-virus companies employ the best hackers in the world for a reason, because the tatics are always changing however the blatantly obvious is ofton staring us in the face.
No we are not Elle... but I have come up with one or two ways of seeing if a reviewer is probably a faker and there is not a lot of point in telling him how on the ratted review as then he will change tactic's and not do that again so would you rather it be ratted and hopefully you might trust my honesty in why its ratted but not state why or would you rather I tell all and have more fakes submitted by him or others that I would not be able to use anymore?
In fairness I try and state why I feel they are fake, pointed out contradictions and if he said xyz I pointed out if many others said the opposite and I recall I got my ass handed to me for doing so again to the broader readership make up your minds.
Also.. but when a review is ratted is says something along the lines that we "feel" its fake.. does not say anything about we have come up with Judge Judy level proof, that wording has been there on a rat statement since long before any com mods started helping in reviews.
Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 07-06-10 at 10:59.
I've said before that a reviews mod's job is basically an impossible one, and I dont envy you. But I would make one point. You seem to be confusing honesty and judgment. If you rat a review then I'm sure you feel it's fake. And I would say you're usually right. But it's a lot easier to be sure of that when we know the reasons. You usually give reasons, and I've commended you on that in the past. But when reasons are absent or partial there is always going to be doubt, and you shouldn't interpret that as people doubting you honesty, when they're just wondering if you haven't perhaps made a mistake.
“I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
“All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.