Moderator comments v's EI comments on reviews

[Fountain_Of_All_Knowledge]

I have to agree witrh this!

[naughty nina]

I havent removed it out of respect for you and your team .

You make enemies doing that sort of thing .


love nina xxx

[MrFussy]

How can customers who truly wish all the fee to go to the escort not be impacted by not knowing these facts before deciding?

If you dont care then fine but those that do have a right to all the info and decide for themselves...

Ok then Ei...there are 22 escorts advertised as Independents currently working in Dublin from 3 European agencies. There are 4 escort profiles that are advertised as Independant that are also advertised as Irish Agency. This is not about helping the punters. If a guy goes to see a girl, say Nina, and has a great time or a bad time then he will review accordingly. If a guy goes to an Agency girl, he takes the same risk. If you are going to apply the new distinction, then apply it consistentently....so I expect certain D1, D2, D4, D8, D 18, D24 girls to have any reviews updated....but not their profiles Natasha.

[zicooo]

Second time to reply. Nina has good reviews, no one thinks she is being violated, abused,threatened by third parties, her customers support her. She was in an agency, theres doubt about the source of her payment. And the problem is what? NUmerous reviews disclose escorts whose phones are answered by english speakers while they are not. Who exactly do you think the receptionists are, their grannies, what hypocrisy. They are "independents" who are organised by third parties, how else would they organise accomodation around the country? I have been with several of these women, not one has displayed any sign of duress, get real. Why are escorts with unverified photos with no reviews allowed to advertise? Revenue. This should not be allowed, for some reason Nina has been picked on by a technicality, many more frauds are allowed run free, many reviwers refer to photo/favourite fraud, why are these women not banned, these are real complaints, not like the pedantic trawling of porn sites to fuind identikit pictures of women, just give this guy the badge he wants, "witchfinder general", take on the real cheats and ban them, hit them in the pockets thats the only way to make them pay. The fiasco over anon211 is bad enough, the trusted reviewer notion is an enormous joke, does everyone have to have a title, if its not that its "I'm Leaving please print my eulogies" quickly followed by reveral of resignation, I dont care if you resign or not or go to the dead zone that is IIE, this is not facebook, grow up everybody.

[Fountain_Of_All_Knowledge]

Want some valium mate?

[Natasha]

If a profile is brought to my attention of having false information i will have a look at it and take action as i feel necessary.

[Quarterpoundher]

Second time to reply. Nina has good reviews, no one thinks she is being violated, abused,threatened by third parties, her customers support her. She was in an agency, theres doubt about the source of her payment. And the problem is what? NUmerous reviews disclose escorts whose phones are answered by english speakers while they are not. Who exactly do you think the receptionists are, their grannies, what hypocrisy. They are "independents" who are organised by third parties, how else would they organise accomodation around the country? I have been with several of these women, not one has displayed any sign of duress, get real. Why are escorts with unverified photos with no reviews allowed to advertise? Revenue. This should not be allowed, for some reason Nina has been picked on by a technicality, many more frauds are allowed run free, many reviwers refer to photo/favourite fraud, why are these women not banned, these are real complaints, not like the pedantic trawling of porn sites to fuind identikit pictures of women, just give this guy the badge he wants, "witchfinder general", take on the real cheats and ban them, hit them in the pockets thats the only way to make them pay. The fiasco over anon211 is bad enough, the trusted reviewer notion is an enormous joke, does everyone have to have a title, if its not that its "I'm Leaving please print my eulogies" quickly followed by reveral of resignation, I dont care if you resign or not or go to the dead zone that is IIE, this is not facebook, grow up everybody.

No!! whats really coming to light here is that many have shown that in general they dont give a fuck what the escorts situation is...

I say again it boils down to this

Some dont care... grand job and off you go

but

some do so those that dont then ignore that valid and factual info and those that do then decide is it something that will be a factor in booking..

Its that simple and its what needs to be done whenever facts present themselves..

If a landline IP from UK when in Ireland being logged and a shared credit card is not worthy of mention then I don't know what is...

No one is saying anyone is being mis treated by an agency but I am saying loud and clear that people who wish to see only independents have every right to be made aware of facts that exist.

[MrFussy]

If a profile is brought to my attention of having false information i will have a look at it and take action as i feel necessary.

Fair play Zico.
What do you regard as false Natasha, the verified photos system, the opting out of reviews after negative reviews etc. These are instances whereby people spend money and are being ripped off. Deciding to pick on an escort with countless good reviews is a witch-hunt. Do you want me to publish the names of the girls who work for foreign agencies here...is that not something that maybe you would check before taking the same CC info each week.

[Patricia]

Natasha, staff, mods, can I suggest we all stop discussing this. Let other people debate it if they wish but we have explained our position very clearly many times now. We are just going around in circles. So I say, no point saying any more about it.

[MrFussy]

No!! whats really coming to light here is that many have shown that in general they dont give a fuck what the escorts situation is...

I say again it boils down to this

Some dont care... grand job and off you go

but

some do so those that dont then ignore that valid and factual info and those that do then decide is it something that will be a factor in booking..

Its that simple and its what needs to be done whenever facts present themselves..

If a landline IP from UK when in Ireland being logged and a shared credit card is not worthy of mention then I don't know what is...

No one is saying anyone is being mis treated by an agency but I am saying loud and clear that people who wish to see only independents have every right to be made aware of facts that exist.

I will say this 1 more time Luther so you are clear. Yes, by all means address any issues as EI see them. But if they notice the same Credit Card etc. that is not to be addressed on our reviews...take it upidirectly with the escort in question. If the profile is that impacted take it down.....