Get rid of it, it isn't helpful!
Keep it, but changes are needed to how it works!
Keep it as is, it is helpful!
And of course the one eyed Escort is Queen
My metaphor is that it needs both trusted Clients and Trusted Escorts to have any real shot at coming up with a workable way to get valid and truthful reviews.
Trusted reviewers to post reviews and a few trusted Escorts who have seen a particular Client to vote that he is the real deal and thus is deserving of that much sought after badge to be awarded to a potential new trusted reviewer.
How can any one review mod (or a group) possibly know who is a potential perfectly honest reviewer?
Why waste the enormous resource of the people who have actually seen them up close and personnel and not pm a few who have been reviewed and if say 5 say he is who he is and review is valid then badge him?
And before anyone picks holes in it, off course its not perfect, nothing ever will be when it comes to reviews but badges should be issued based on Client posters saying they have faith in his reviews and a few trusted Escorts saying similar.
Two people with one eye each end up with 20/20 vision if they work together and got to better then the blind leading the blind.
Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 29-01-10 at 14:16.
No i think what should happen Carlos is the Trusted Reviewer should not announce who he is..
If restaurant inspectors announced who they were, then the meal would always be perfect..
A Trusted Reviewer should say nothing..
If he does announce who he is then i believe the escort involved should report said reviewer to Pat and he should be stripped of his medal...
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
Oscar Wilde
Could anybody be sad enough to try this???? I think that all reviews should be anonymous. One of the things that surprises me is that every review that I have had in this name is for a meeting that has, theoretically, taken place at 8am on the morning of the review. Nobody has ever queried this. I pick this time because it is the one time that most escorts can be sure that they did not meet anybody. I do this because I think that it is important that there is no connection between me and my persona here. This means that I can give objective reviews and still meet the girls again. If a girl asks me to write a review for her, I say ' sorry, I dont do reviews'
In my experience, the difference between great sex and poor sex with an escort is largely down to mutual respect and consideration. Great sex is where the girl is as hungry and horny for it as you are and wants to put everything that she knows into it. Anybody who is a regular client of escorts will have no doubt as to which girls are enjoying great sex and which are faking it. As a client you know full well the difference between coming out of a session where you have had a good 'service' and a session where you have had great sex. Every session that you go to, you hope that it will be great sex. The rapport between the two of you is vital. If you start out as some sad f*cker using a potential review to get some kind of better service, you have lost before you even begin.
Lisa Simspon
"if you are the police who will police the police"
Homer
" I donnt know ............ coastguard"
dear dear you sound like a guy that is jealous of punters with a trusted reviewer badge or perhaps maybe you lost a trusted reviewer badge under a different users name you seem botherd by this i would say that anna and most good genuine escorts would give a genuine service to a client anyway
Jeeze I getting sick and tired with all these posts of guys complaining about who has a medal and who hasn’t, who is abusing theirs and who isn’t. Jesus lads we are losing the plot here. Reviews are there to help us as punters to get a good experience for our hard earned. Who gives a shit if a guy has a MEDAL or not, surely if at least he reviews and gives SOME sort of help to us guys rather than us being a Guiney pig and finding out that Cheryl Cole turns out to be Susan Boyle.
I have a medal and I have no idea who decided to AWARD it, but is prob because I decide to get up off my arse and leave a review. But to touch on the point “should medal reviewers get preferred treatment” - well feck ye - I spend my money like the rest, but at least I give a review - as best I can to MY taste. I have never told any escort who I am, I don’t PM, and I don’t think it is necessary to tell, but having said that - save having an asshole pompously broadcasting he is a MEDAL reviewer - trusted reviewers should be awarded the escort being in a better mood at least, than Joe soap. For the effort he has given to “the community”, doesn’t he deserve it? Grow up lads.
P.S. As a so called trusted reviewer I would like to propose that Mr Maxi be given a badge. Believe me I have no idea who the guy is but aren’t the calibre of his reviews what we all should be giving. Let me know what ye think……
Reviews of Irish escorts written by Irish escort client mr maxi - Escort Ireland
I suppose i should at least leave a link fo Mr Maxi's reviews. I hope that works. Excuse me Im new to this world.