Originally Posted by
El Gordo
I have a question about this. The note just says "2nd review". That makes it sound like it was your second review ever, not just your second review of Anna. After all, "First review" always means no previous reviews, not no previous reviews of this escort. And I'm pretty sure that "2nd review" has been used on other reviews to mean that the reviewer has only one previous review, although such notes seem to be quite rare. So I think the note is confusing.
The point is an important one, because most people would interpret "second review ever" as a bad sign while "second review of this escort" would normally be a good sign.
I would suggest the following:
- Reviews with notes that say just "second review" are confusing and should have their notes changed to make it clearer what was meant. There aren't many of these. Less than 20, I think. I can send a list to a reviews mod if needed. Pm me if interested.
- Second, or subsequent, reviews of the same escort should have a more detailed note, like "This reviewer has reviewed this escort before. E-I policy is to list only the most recent review." For anyone who types slow, you can just bookmark this post and copy and paste.
- Reviewers' second reviews should not be marked. There's nothing particularly suspicious about having only two reviews. Even if they're both written on the day the reviewer registered. Someone may decide to register in order to review an escort he's seen recently, and may decide that he might as well review an escort he's seen earlier while he's at it. That's in fact what I did, with Eve and Agatha, if I remember correctly. Besides, we can all see the reviewer's number of reviews, his registration date and the date of the review at the top of the page, so a note wouldn't give anyone any new information.