Originally Posted by
Quarterpoundher
Then if he or anyone wishes to continue to defend themselves then they remain withing the rules in defending themselves...
How on Earth is telling a Woman to go f herself and call her a B***h defending himself????
Its quite simple, work within the rules and mods and members paths with never cross.
No way should a thread be closed because the subject of the thread is unable to restrain his foul mouth to another member....
Should a pub be closed because of one drunken customer? no, you turf the drunk onto the street to sober up and let the others enjoy their night and if they happen to talk about the drunk in his absence then so be it.
I think you should read what I wrote
I never said his comment to anna was defending himself,
rightly or wrongly he was banned for what he said to anna ( I think wrongly but that is another topic)
The person he had the altercation with then opened a thread about him while he was banned and unable to defend himself. Effectively he was enticed to break the ban to defend himself.
It used to be considered good manners here not to attack people who were not in a position to defend themselves, so in the days of banishment to the soap opera if you had something to say to one of the banished you posted in the section he/she could reply to.
It was bad manners to start a thread about nicegirls while he was under a ban and it was poor moderating to leave it open, a temporary closure till his banned expired would have been fairer.
Its the Crips and the Bloods all over again