Originally Posted by
easycum
I recently left a review for an escort along the lines of "Knocked on door, girl different from the woman in the pictures, would usually leave straight away, stayed anyway, was happy enough I did".
The review had the part about not being the girl in the pics completely removed, so the review barely makes sense. At least put something in there to show the review was moderated?
But more importantly, surely the point of the review is the warn fellow punters about this kind of thing. There is ZERO doubt this girl was not the girl in the pictures, unless the escort magically became 10 years younger, removed all her tattoos, and took out her breast implants. We can't report fake pictures "if you have met the escort and were not happy with the likeness", so where does that leave us if we can't say this in the reviews? This girl is heavily advertised here, as I presume she's paid a higher fee to be displayed constantly on the front page, so seems like EI interests are a bit misaligned...
Now I know these girls often work with other girls, and it might have been a case of her "friend" being available while the escort I wanted to see was busy (I suspect I even know which profile was the girl I actually met), but that doesn't really make it any better, as it's the punter's time that has been potentially wasted being presented with a different girl.