Did anyone seen the documentary last night?
Just sad what going on in this world
Did anyone seen the documentary last night?
Just sad what going on in this world
Last edited by libby; 07-03-19 at 19:51.
❤Diamond Libby❤
SEX IS AN ADDICTION
AND ANAL AN OBSESSION...
Here I Am Back to Ireland ....
Don't Miss Me Out
Missed it. Anyone care to give a brief description ?
❤Diamond Libby❤
SEX IS AN ADDICTION
AND ANAL AN OBSESSION...
Here I Am Back to Ireland ....
Don't Miss Me Out
Sensual massage with Thai oil massage elements ★★★★★
Upcoming tour updated:
See you in Belfast! 🚢 and then in Dublin 24! ☘️
libby (07-03-19)
Who would ever have guessed ?
Are we there yet ?
Sensual massage with Thai oil massage elements ★★★★★
Upcoming tour updated:
See you in Belfast! 🚢 and then in Dublin 24! ☘️
libby (07-03-19)
Exactly. I haven’t seen the documentary yet. However, people tend to forget the following salient points.
Jackson was investigated by the FBI, LAPD, sheriffs office and Santa Monica PD and no evidence was found.
He was ACQUITTED of all charges in 2005.
The guys in the film testified on Jackson’s behalf in the same case.
They had their own lawsuit filed in 2007, thrown out by a probate court.
I can’t understand who seems more credible in all this? It seems obvious to me at least!?
Can these two guys now be charged with perjury since they testified under oath in 2005 that nothing of a sexual nature happened???
It’s just bizzarre... he was obviously a strange guy but that in itself is not a crime.
I for one will remain on the fence on this one....
bmw528 (07-03-19), Irish Siobhan (09-03-19), JMastodon (08-03-19), Stephanie (08-03-19), willie wacker (07-03-19)
I would like to see it but haven’t found a link to it. Anyone care to share?
[B][I]Life is too short for bad coffee and bad sex.
Hardly what I would call irrefutable evidence to be fair.
I’m not disputing the fact the guy was a sandwich or two short of a picnic...
And pointing out holes in the theory doesn’t make me a paedo apologist, I’m just sceptical of their motives and credibility given their past performance. Because “past performance” is the barometer we are using against Jackson is it not?