An escort

[citygambler]

I posted on a previous thread. I wanted to clarify a misleading statement made by the mods. They stated a review I left was on hold because xxxxx a Domme who alternates between Sandyford and Smithfield challeng3d the review and because I didn't reply they deleted the r3view. This is not true after I left the review the lady opted out of reviews. She later opted back in. She has successfully challenged genuine reviews before. After she opted back in I checked my messages and replied stating the basis of her challenge was false. E.I. NOW state I never replied I can provide evidence of this I replied m9re than once. This throws up a number of questions. Did E.I. check whether I replied before they falsely stated I hadn't replied. Do they take into account the fact that an escort gas a history of falsely challenging review. Is there any point to the whole review process when an escort can get a review pulled by making a false claim about the review. If E.I. did check whether I replied why did they state I didn't. Why did they cl9se a thread and not give me a chance to reply on the thread.