Originally Posted by
Sailor
LuckLu,
I presume there would be no problem with me posting a glowing review of her (as I have of many escorts over the years) as this would contribute to increasing the amount of clients that go to see her which in turn would go towards ensuring EI keep getting her advertising subscriptions. But when I witness her trying to rob me, EI don't allow me to name her in the warning and won't allow me to post an account of the experience in her review section which is where it needs to be so clients can be warned and make up their own minds. By this logic it's evident that the protection of her and EI's continued income stream is obviously of greater importance to EI than the protection of clients she may try to do the same thing to in the future. These clients might choose to visit another escort and thereby avoid attempted robbery or even robbery if they're not as fortunate as I was to catch her in the act had EI made them aware, as I have made EI aware, of my experience.
Posting my review on her profile would lead to one of two things. 1. She would be forced to give some kind of account for what happened and I have no problem backing up what I witnessed and have already posted here, or 2. She would have to switch off her review section if she didn't want prospective clients to read the review and consequently get less business. This seems like a pretty light sanction given what I saw her try to do to me . I was using this website for years before I even knew there was a warning section. An anonymous warning in a part of the website infrequently visited by most users is about as much use as a chocolate teapot in this situation and not much of a stretch from EI actually condoning her behaviour.
But I'm starting to get it now. Maybe I'm a bit slow on the uptake. I thought you guy's might actually do something. Good to know where I stand. Thanks for the clarification.
Sailor