Catriona (11-12-14), circumcised guy (11-12-14), Empirical (11-12-14), FetishCherry (12-12-14), gameboy (12-12-14), Mr Cuddles (11-12-14), Nicole (11-12-14), NoBrain2 (11-12-14), Petros (11-12-14), Sexy Sandy 69 (11-12-14), SmallHorn (11-12-14), The Equalizer (13-12-14), the traveller (11-12-14)
That's kinda my point Sam. I believe his article will surely suffer the same fate as the formers. Why? Because it's bias, and bias articles don't hold any substance.
The people looking for the law to be passed are speaking also from a very biased viewpoint, and I fully disagree with them. Now counteracting/tackling that in the same tunnel visioned way, is surely something doomed for failure.
What I suggested is the only unbiased viewpoint available to both sides of the argument, agreed? I honestly believe that. Why should the public not be involved. I'm sure most of the general public would agree a man visiting a genuine escort isn't a crime, so why not utilise it? Surely that's how a journalist should operate.
IMO, it's just going around in circles.
FetishCherry (12-12-14)
FetishCherry (12-12-14), samlad (11-12-14)
Too little too late really as the Bill is passed and that's it.
Them lousy lot is Stormont couldn't care less now.
someone needs to bring up that you cant punish the client and not the sex worker, youre just basically using the sex workers as bait then (aka state sponsored pimping) if there was nobody selling sex then there would be no clients, its fucked how a couple of countries get away with this including northern ireland now
thats something that needs to be talked about.
Last edited by funlover12; 12-12-14 at 09:07.
they see prostitution as scum, and a 'vice' of society and want to get married men to stop using them because they think they will be saving homes and marriages, but the irony is they will be destroying more now, these laws are ripe for blackmail (well more than they already are) where as now its one persons word against another (client vs pimp/escort and who is wifey more likely to believe, husband or these?) now it will be backed by law (wifey will be going with the police now over what the husband says) so what could have been sorted out before now wont be able to be, which will lead to more wrecked homes not less
this is an angle I have not heard anything about before, if someone (some people, I mean clients in this case) wants something they will do it regardless, and fuck the consequences. wont someone please think of the children!
daddy cant otherwise he wouldnt be sticking cock in sex workers before the change in law
Last edited by funlover12; 12-12-14 at 09:26.
Curvaceous Kate (12-12-14), FetishCherry (12-12-14)
Andy, if you're serious about this, and I'll do you the courtesy of assuming that you are, here are two things you need to follow up on:
1. Follow The Money (eg Ruhama, Sisters of Mercy, Magdalene Laundries)
2. Ask why Norway is thinking of abandoning the Nordic Model after only a few years (unintended consequences)
Curvaceous Kate (12-12-14), the traveller (13-12-14)
I agree with u 100% . I noticed always when is an article about prostitutes in newspapers (online) or magazines etc the most hateful comments towards escorts coming from women. They consider us a 'danger' for them families and if we thinking the feminist groups and ideas plus minister of justice is woman too i understand why they wanted them men to stop visiting us.(leaving aside the bullshit with pimps and trafficked women). They are so stupid and totally wrong. If guys will dont go to escorts they will find what they looking for in other places: a coleg from work, a girl in a club or on the street etc and will be more dangerous for them relation as that girls might want them man for good , at list an escort want just his money and send them man back home lol. Silly them
Always Smile
Prickly (12-12-14)
Melindablondey (13-12-14), talkabout (13-12-14)