Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Criminalising punters: Talk on Radio

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Curious k View Post
    Is this what journalism has become?

    Honestly what opinion do you expect from escorts and their clients? They obviously think the law is wrong, and will also argue the sex business is great for them and their clients.

    You may as well try interview the people pushing for the law to be introduced, and get the exact opposite but equally predictable answers.

    If you're a journalist, why not come up with something creative? Write about your own experiences? If you don't have any experience, maybe you should stick to what you know. Also you could ask the general public, go out with a public survey and ask people of all ages, sex, religion.

    How lazy has journalism become. FFS
    Well, nobody else is doing anything about it, and the few that do get hushed or pushed aside, so fair play to Andy from the BBC.

  2. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserCatriona (11-12-14), circumcised guy (11-12-14), Empirical (11-12-14), Escort AdvertiserFetishCherry (12-12-14), gameboy (12-12-14), Mr Cuddles (11-12-14), Nicole (11-12-14), NoBrain2 (11-12-14), Petros (11-12-14), Sexy Sandy 69 (11-12-14), SmallHorn (11-12-14), The Equalizer (13-12-14), the traveller (11-12-14)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    280

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Well, nobody else is doing anything about it, and the few that do get hushed or pushed aside, so fair play to Andy from the BBC.
    That's kinda my point Sam. I believe his article will surely suffer the same fate as the formers. Why? Because it's bias, and bias articles don't hold any substance.

    The people looking for the law to be passed are speaking also from a very biased viewpoint, and I fully disagree with them. Now counteracting/tackling that in the same tunnel visioned way, is surely something doomed for failure.

    What I suggested is the only unbiased viewpoint available to both sides of the argument, agreed? I honestly believe that. Why should the public not be involved. I'm sure most of the general public would agree a man visiting a genuine escort isn't a crime, so why not utilise it? Surely that's how a journalist should operate.

    IMO, it's just going around in circles.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Curious k View Post
    That's kinda my point Sam. I believe his article will surely suffer the same fate as the formers. Why? Because it's bias, and bias articles don't hold any substance.

    The people looking for the law to be passed are speaking also from a very biased viewpoint, and I fully disagree with them. Now counteracting/tackling that in the same tunnel visioned way, is surely something doomed for failure.

    What I suggested is the only unbiased viewpoint available to both sides of the argument, agreed? I honestly believe that. Why should the public not be involved. I'm sure most of the general public would agree a man visiting a genuine escort isn't a crime, so why not utilise it? Surely that's how a journalist should operate.

    IMO, it's just going around in circles.
    Okay, then we shall assume that you won't be taking part.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserFetishCherry (12-12-14)

  6. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Okay, then we shall assume that you won't be taking part.

    Pray he isn't.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    Escort AdvertiserFetishCherry (12-12-14), samlad (11-12-14)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    262
    Reviews
    3

    Default

    Too little too late really as the Bill is passed and that's it.
    Them lousy lot is Stormont couldn't care less now.

  9. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    10,794
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    someone needs to bring up that you cant punish the client and not the sex worker, youre just basically using the sex workers as bait then (aka state sponsored pimping) if there was nobody selling sex then there would be no clients, its fucked how a couple of countries get away with this including northern ireland now

    thats something that needs to be talked about.
    Last edited by funlover12; 12-12-14 at 09:07.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to funlover12 For This Useful Post:

    Larrii (12-12-14), talkabout (12-12-14)

  11. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    10,794
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funlover12 View Post
    someone needs to bring up that you cant punish the client and not the sex worker, youre just basically using the sex workers as bait then (aka state sponsored pimping) if there was nobody selling sex then there would be no clients, its fucked how a couple of countries get away with this including northern ireland now

    thats something that needs to be talked about.
    they see prostitution as scum, and a 'vice' of society and want to get married men to stop using them because they think they will be saving homes and marriages, but the irony is they will be destroying more now, these laws are ripe for blackmail (well more than they already are) where as now its one persons word against another (client vs pimp/escort and who is wifey more likely to believe, husband or these?) now it will be backed by law (wifey will be going with the police now over what the husband says) so what could have been sorted out before now wont be able to be, which will lead to more wrecked homes not less

    this is an angle I have not heard anything about before, if someone (some people, I mean clients in this case) wants something they will do it regardless, and fuck the consequences. wont someone please think of the children!
    daddy cant otherwise he wouldnt be sticking cock in sex workers before the change in law
    Last edited by funlover12; 12-12-14 at 09:26.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to funlover12 For This Useful Post:

    Curvaceous Kate (12-12-14), Escort AdvertiserFetishCherry (12-12-14)

  13. Default

    Andy, if you're serious about this, and I'll do you the courtesy of assuming that you are, here are two things you need to follow up on:

    1. Follow The Money (eg Ruhama, Sisters of Mercy, Magdalene Laundries)
    2. Ask why Norway is thinking of abandoning the Nordic Model after only a few years (unintended consequences)

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to liffey For This Useful Post:

    Curvaceous Kate (12-12-14), the traveller (13-12-14)

  15. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funlover12 View Post
    they see prostitution as scum, and a 'vice' of society and want to get married men to stop using them because they think they will be saving homes and marriages, but the irony is they will be destroying more now, these laws are ripe for blackmail (well more than they already are) where as now its one persons word against another (client vs pimp/escort and who is wifey more likely to believe, husband or these?) now it will be backed by law (wifey will be going with the police now over what the husband says) so what could have been sorted out before now wont be able to be, which will lead to more wrecked homes not less


    this is an angle I have not heard anything about before, if someone (some people, I mean clients in this case) wants something they will do it regardless, and fuck the consequences. wont someone please think of the children!
    daddy cant otherwise he wouldnt be sticking cock in sex workers before the change in law

    I agree with u 100% . I noticed always when is an article about prostitutes in newspapers (online) or magazines etc the most hateful comments towards escorts coming from women. They consider us a 'danger' for them families and if we thinking the feminist groups and ideas plus minister of justice is woman too i understand why they wanted them men to stop visiting us.(leaving aside the bullshit with pimps and trafficked women). They are so stupid and totally wrong. If guys will dont go to escorts they will find what they looking for in other places: a coleg from work, a girl in a club or on the street etc and will be more dangerous for them relation as that girls might want them man for good , at list an escort want just his money and send them man back home lol. Silly them
    Always Smile

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to FetishCherry For This Useful Post:

    Prickly (12-12-14)

  17. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,758
    Blog Entries
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funlover12 View Post
    someone needs to bring up that you cant punish the client and not the sex worker, youre just basically using the sex workers as bait then (aka state sponsored pimping) if there was nobody selling sex then there would be no clients, its fucked how a couple of countries get away with this including northern ireland now

    thats something that needs to be talked about.
    They know that we get punished indirectly. they are getting us via our stability (we won't have any) that's financial and physical, loss of wages and lack of safety.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Curvaceous Kate For This Useful Post:

    Melindablondey (13-12-14), talkabout (13-12-14)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •