Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Banned Reviewers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,364

    Cool Banned Reviewers

    To submit a review one must be registered on the forum. I am sure the majority of reviewers do not post (the genuine ones) and a very good % do not use the boards at all , to pm , to log in his account to read a thread etc ..

    When one joins he agrees to play by some rules , which I never read them myself , therefore , I don't think people do read them either.

    Because the forum is moderated at it best , not perfect , some people get banned. Others ask for a ban.

    When those cases happen , they can not review anymore.

    For whatever happens on the boards , an argument with another poster for example , that client can not review anymore (not from his account anyway).

    I was thinking a good client should keep reviewing the ladies he visits , even if he has no access to the forum (banned user).

    I agree there are many reviewers and I can say are many more who do not review whatsoever because they do not want a forum account.

    Discuss.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,629
    Reviews
    2

    Default

    Id say abt 90% of reviewers dont even use the forum's anyway so i dont see it as an issue. Those that do know the rules, so if they get banned the should lose their privilege to review!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gentelmandave View Post
    Id say abt 90% of reviewers dont even use the forum's anyway so i dont see it as an issue. Those that do know the rules, so if they get banned the should lose their privilege to review!
    The review has very little with the forum , in fact is only the forum account an reviewer has.

    90% of genuine reviewers ?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,629
    Reviews
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Divine View Post
    The review has very little with the forum , in fact is only the forum account an reviewer has.

    90% of genuine reviewers ?
    We only have One account for both the Reviews and Forum! so why should a punter who gets banned from the forums be allowed to review? Sure all Reviewers are Genuine Just like Escorts

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,837
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Of the banned users, I think it would be safe to assume that the vast majority of them were banned for a reason instead of asking to be banned.

    Also, those who have asked for self bans in the past (from my own personal perspective anyway) request bans not just to get away from the forums but mostly to avoid the temptation of visiting escorts.

    That's my two cents anyway, of course exceptions apply to both cases above but on very rare occasions I would think.
    ladiesman217: April 2009 to April 2024

    Goodbye

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to ladiesman217 For This Useful Post:

    Rachel Divine (02-10-13)

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ladiesman217 View Post
    Of the banned users, I think it would be safe to assume that the vast majority of them were banned for a reason instead of asking to be banned.

    Also, those who have asked for self bans in the past (from my own personal perspective anyway) request bans not just to get away from the forums but mostly to avoid the temptation of visiting escorts.

    That's my two cents anyway, of course exceptions apply to both cases above but on very rare occasions I would think.
    I get it.
    Should an argument on the boards ,which leads to a banning ,to be a reason to take away the right/ability to review?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Rachel Divine For This Useful Post:

    zoozoozoo (03-10-13)

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gentelmandave View Post
    We only have One account for both the Reviews and Forum! so why should a punter who gets banned from the forums be allowed to review? Sure all Reviewers are Genuine Just like Escorts
    Escorts do have two accounts , one for the boards , one for advertising.
    The client gets banned , not allowed to post/pm yet he should be able to review from his account.
    Genuine escort?
    Pays the ad, while the client (banned) could contribute to inform the rest of his experiences from his account (even banned from using the boards).
    Last edited by Rachel Divine; 02-10-13 at 23:52.

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CapSpaulding View Post
    O I Could Bit My Tongue Right Now........ Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. Rachel Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...
    Hello

    Please , behave !! x

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    729
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    I don’t see a problem with banned users being aloud to review as each review is screened by a moderator before been submitted anyway. I do think that the review system is a very useful and beneficial tool, however after a point I find it becomes irrelevant to me, how many reviews are required to indicate all the qualities of a said escort, ok I can buy into the view that an escort likes to have the odd good review that is recent to indicate that they are keeping up their quality of service etc, fair enough.

    Then as for clients why do we review, it is a question I have always asked myself, is it to thank the escort, there are many other ways to do that or is it to inform others even if they (escort) have 101+ previous reviews or is it just to put another notch on the post, probably all three I would guess.

    Anyway I have never been comfortable leaving a review and have decided never to do one again, even if I had reason and even if just for my own peace of mind. Maybe that’s a cop out but it’s one that I need.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to thewren For This Useful Post:

    Rachel Divine (03-10-13)

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    The point of most self bans is to prevent people from interacting and reviewing. If someone is banned for a breach of rules or trolling, they should lose all privileges and we already have enough factors to consider in place when reviews come in without having to worry about who is banned or not on top of that.

    There are no 'genuine' reviewers on an anonymous forum as even some 'trusted reviewers' were found to be abusing their position, and this still goes on because people with many reviews are still sort of regarded as 'genuine' when we know this isn't always the case.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •