Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: High Court orders six internet service providers to block Pirate Bay access

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,796

    Default High Court orders six internet service providers to block Pirate Bay access

    High Court orders six internet service providers to block Pirate Bay access



    SIX internet service providers (ISPs) must block access by subscribers to various Pirate Bay websites within 30 days, the High Court has ruled.

    Quote Originally Posted by Independent.ie
    About 200,000 Irish users, representing some 8pc of all internet users here, access the Pirate Bay sites monthly and illegal file-sharing is devastating sales of music, film and TV here with serious consequences for artists, record companies, retailers and employment, it was claimed.

    EMI, Sony, Warner Music and Universal had alleged the Pirate Bay activities were causing them some €20m losses annually and sought the orders against UPC, Imagine, Vodafone, Digiweb, Hutchison 3G Ltd and Telefonica O2 Ireland Ltd.

    Eircom has already voluntarily blocked access by its subscribers to Pirate Bay and the companies claimed a new regulation means other ISPs must do the same. The defendants effectively adopted a neutral stance to the companies application but some raised issues including alleging overblocking could affect legitimate sites.

    Today, Mr Justice Brian McGovern said he was satisfied to make the order blocking Pirate Bay in circumstances including that new copyright laws here and in the EU permitted such orders to be made.

    He agreed with a previous High Court judge who had said he would make such blocking orders if the law permitted and noted the law now allowed for such orders.

    The form of the orders means the music companies will not have to make fresh applications to court if Pirate Bay changes its location on the internet.

    The judge noted the companies had accepted they should meet the costs of blocking the Pirate Bay sites.

    While none of the defendant companies were wrongdoers in the case and had effectively adopted a neutral stance apart from engaging in some legitimate dialogue with the companies, the providers were the conduit through which the wrongful activity conducted by The Pirate Bay has been effected, he said.

    "There is no doubt but that this activity has caused, and continues to cause, substantial financial damage to the plaintiffs."

    The record companies claimed the Pirate Bay sites hold a vast directory of copyright material being made available to millions around the world.

    About 25pc of that material was music, 20pc was film and 15pc was TV. It was conservatively estimated about 78pc of the music and 90pc of the film and TV was copyright and his side's experts also calculated up to US$36m dollars advertising revenue is generated annually for the Pirate Bay sites, they claimed.
    Source: click here

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Lara Mills For This Useful Post:

    Rachel Divine (12-06-13)

  3. #2

    Default

    I mean yes...who are we to take money from the likes of this poor man

    “Nothing is more creative... nor destructive... than a brilliant mind with a purpose.”
    ― Dan Brown, Inferno

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to TomEA For This Useful Post:

    Lara Mills (12-06-13)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,700
    Reviews
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lara View Post
    High Court orders six internet service providers to block Pirate Bay access



    SIX internet service providers (ISPs) must block access by subscribers to various Pirate Bay websites within 30 days, the High Court has ruled.



    Source: click here
    Amazing what money can do ,,how many years have the same ISP's allowed child porn sites to be accessed through their srevers without any action regardless ?
    So what next , can we expect any site with the word " escort " in the address line also to be blocked , looks like 1984 should have been titled 2014

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to zoozoozoo For This Useful Post:

    Lara Mills (12-06-13), Nicole (12-06-13), samlad (12-06-13)

  7. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    To be honest, this is what is pushing companies like Microsoft to implement such mental restrictions. People whine about the price of DVDs, music and video games so they download them instead, not realising that ultimately, industries will start churning out mediocre shite just to make a quick buck where they can.

    Zoozoozoo hit the nail on the head there; if the High Courts can stop software piracy sites, why not kiddie-fiddling sites?! World gone mad!

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    Lara Mills (12-06-13), Nicole (12-06-13), zoozoozoo (12-06-13)

  9. #5

    Default

    I may or may not illegally download...but I will tell you one thing, I for one am not willing to pay £0.99 a song, that is extortion.

    The like of DVD's I don't mind buying, £10 a pop, maybe less if I can get it and I see that as just about what I'm willing to pay. However the cinema, you go now with two people and a slither or food and it's still £30!

    Fuck the system, I'm going to find Jack Sparrow.
    “Nothing is more creative... nor destructive... than a brilliant mind with a purpose.”
    ― Dan Brown, Inferno

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to TomEA For This Useful Post:

    jacksparrow2010 (06-07-13)

  11. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PeepingTom View Post
    I may or may not illegally download...but I will tell you one thing, I for one am not willing to pay £0.99 a song, that is extortion.

    The like of DVD's I don't mind buying, £10 a pop, maybe less if I can get it and I see that as just about what I'm willing to pay. However the cinema, you go now with two people and a slither or food and it's still £30!

    Fuck the system, I'm going to find Jack Sparrow.
    When I was younger, you would pay around £15 for an album (in the 90's), so alternatively, we would just record songs from the radio on tape cassette as a cheaper alternative (static and background noise and all). DVD's are much cheaper these days; you would pay around £15 - £20 back in' day, and I believe the price drops are more to do with supermarkets bulk-buying to undercut competitors and every household affording DVD players (these were luxury items in the 90's and very, very expensive!). When a film was launched in the cinema, you would wait 9-12 months for the DVD/VHS release but now three months in most cases. "Times are a Changin'" as my mate Bob used to say.
    Last edited by samlad; 12-06-13 at 12:17.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    zoozoozoo (12-06-13)

  13. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    It's a PR joke, government wants to keep these companies happy so they go after an easy target as if blocking one site will make any difference to illegal downloads, it's already making a mark but the likes of PublicHd is already as good if not better if torrents are your thing..
    Last edited by anon361; 12-06-13 at 12:42.

  14. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    672
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PeepingTom View Post
    I mean yes...who are we to take money from the likes of this poor man

    Theft is theft, whether you like the person or not. I'm not too happy with the likes of Tesco and the profits they make but I still wouldn't shoplift.

    Most criminals use the bullshit excuse of "it's a victim-less crime" as insurance companies have to pay out and not the victim, but who pays the insurance companies, we all do. People that rob, steal and swindle only push up prices for the rest of society.

    Saying that, I do feel that blocking the Pirate Bay is a joke and is just paying lip service to the entertainment industry. There are thousands of open source and royalty free torrents available and why should they be blocked?

    As has been pointed out already, if you are going to police the internet there are a lot more serious matters to consider first before tackling illegal downloads.

  15. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zoidberg View Post
    Theft is theft, whether you like the person or not. I'm not too happy with the likes of Tesco and the profits they make but I still wouldn't shoplift.

    Most criminals use the bullshit excuse of "it's a victim-less crime" as insurance companies have to pay out and not the victim, but who pays the insurance companies, we all do. People that rob, steal and swindle only push up prices for the rest of society.

    Saying that, I do feel that blocking the Pirate Bay is a joke and is just paying lip service to the entertainment industry. There are thousands of open source and royalty free torrents available and why should they be blocked?

    As has been pointed out already, if you are going to police the internet there are a lot more serious matters to consider first before tackling illegal downloads.
    So maybe my original sentence was written a bit too quickly, I wouldn't actually rob the guy but I wouldn't pay £.10 for one of his songs, let alone a quid.

    Take out the record labels from the equation.
    “Nothing is more creative... nor destructive... than a brilliant mind with a purpose.”
    ― Dan Brown, Inferno

  16. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,700
    Reviews
    104

    Default

    I think the main point of the thread is about blocking web sites , if you do or dont download music/books/films etc either for your own use or to sell on to others is not really the issue , blocking any web sites is a very serious issue in this case BIG money has pushed this issue for a couple of years now ( and have pushed the issue not for legal points but for their own self interest ) ,they failed with Pirate Bay in other countries ,China has and is blocking web sites that do not conform with the party politics ,so what next here a Fine Gael government blocking fianna fail sites ? I know extreme but remember this is a country that women had to go to belfast to buy condoms to embarrass the government of the day to do something about the fact that they were not allowed to be sold here ,if I remember 2 of those womern went on to become leaders of this country , the blocking of this one web site ( well its only one and they are illegal ) can have huge follow ups with regards any site that is in ANY way on the edge of excepted society
    Last edited by zoozoozoo; 12-06-13 at 13:39.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •