Originally Posted by
wingman
Some good points alright Martin.
I was only thinking about this yesterday. I do agree that Suarez should have gotten a more severe punishment than Terry for the following reason(s): Terry said it once, compared to Suarez repeatedly saying it
The manner in which it was said was also important. Terry (who I despise by the way and I can't believe I am actually almost defending) said it once in a outburst of anger. This was clearly a stupid thing to say. I honestly believe Terry does harbour racist thoughts, mainly because of his upbringing in London. Mnay working class Londoners, or "true Brits" in this class despise the influx of immigrants who have taken their jobs. The primary example being cab drivers. However, this is slightly off the point, and this obviously can't be prooven against Terry, so is a moot point. All we know is what he said to Fredinand, behind his back and out of earshot.
Now onto Suarez. As previosuly pointed, he used racist terms many times. I believe, however, it was the manner in which he used them. It was far more derogatory,calculating and sinsiter. For example, "why did you just kick me?", "because you're balck". The essence of what he said it, and how he said it epitomises the essence of colour superiority. He had to be put down bacause he was black. He was inferior, and therefore deserved this treatment because he was black.
In my opinion, Suarez's comments are far more aligned to those of a racist than Terry (can't believe I said that).
So I believe he deserved a more severe ban.
However, Terry should have gotten a 5 game ban in my opinion. Hodgson should learn to shut his mouth (he has since proved again that he is incapable of this) and everyone really should ask themselve "how will I come across if I say this".
Finally, Wilkins is ex Chelsea and a Londoner, I would read between the lines on that one.
Very good blog mate, I could have many pints with you and talk footie for hours. Keep up the good work.