Censorship

[jimbobbins]

So you can't even be bothered making up an excuse for deleting my posts, which couldn't possibly have caused any
more offence than some others on that thread, that weren't deleted.

Come on, Sammy, make something up. You just go to the booklet on spurious reasons, that you got at your induction.

The dog ate your posts.

[Forrest]

The dog ate your posts.

Ah, that's okay so. I just hope they didn't stick in his throat.

I thought it might be something like this.

[saoirsemac]

i do understand censorship, one must look after there own intreasts after all and business is business

but id be more worried that with all the deletion a reported post attacking an escort, unwarrented, you did not even mention the poster name or post was left, espically since he was accusing her of something he cud not prove

as i said i get censorship in business, but i do dislike how that was left,

surely that sends out an inapprioate message that escorts are open to abuse? i mean its our business here, and our money that pays for the site, surely someone making allegations that are not backed up, and then when reported coz undeleted is not good, and hardly respected the escorts, a message u have on this website

i do appriecate you sammy and nic arent here at weekends, so maybe its a case of mods needing to retrained,

i mean while deleting a post why not delete one that was reported as abuse to an escort? im sure this will be sorted now you and nic are in the know about it, but as i said doesnt leave good message

and i do also understand human error, which i hope this was the case, as i wud hate to see this been a new standard here

[Westsidex]

but id be more worried that with all the deletion a reported post attacking an escort, unwarrented, you did not even mention the poster name or post was left, espically since he was accusing her of something he cud not prove

Im assuming that this is aimed at myself. I stand over what I said and by the way, get over me sweetie.

:-)
Westside.

[Forrest]

i do understand censorship, one must look after there own intreasts after all and business is business
but id be more worried that with all the deletion a reported post attacking an escort, unwarrented, you did not even mention the poster name or post was left, espically since he was accusing her of something he cud not prove
as i said i get censorship in business, but i do dislike how that was left,
surely that sends out an inapprioate message that escorts are open to abuse? i mean its our business here, and our money that pays for the site, surely someone making allegations that are not backed up, and then when reported coz undeleted is not good, and hardly respected the escorts, a message u have on this website
i do appriecate you sammy and nic arent here at weekends, so maybe its a case of mods needing to retrained,
i mean while deleting a post why not delete one that was reported as abuse to an escort? im sure this will be sorted now you and nic are in the know about it, but as i said doesnt leave good message
and i do also understand human error, which i hope this was the case, as i wud hate to see this been a new standard here

I wasn't really sure who you were referring to in your post, Sao, and even with Westie's intervention,
I'm not much the wiser as to what you mean, without an appropriate link.

Im assuming that this is aimed at myself. I stand over what I said and by the way, get over me sweetie.

:-)
Westside.

You always do, don't you.

By the way, who are you, and why do you spend so much time trying to wind people up here.

[saoirsemac]

I wasn't really sure who you were referring to in your post, Sao, and even with Westie's intervention,
I'm not much the wiser as to what you mean, without an appropriate link.



You always do, don't you.

By the way, who are you, and why do you spend so much time trying to wind people up here.

links cud be seen as shit stirring, and i have enu infractions currently,

i used no names, but the managment knows this case, merely pointing out, it not good to allow abuse, accusations (unproven) to be left on a site, which cud damage A PAYING ADVERTISER, i personal see it unfair, considering there was a high volume of posts deleted, and wudnt want to see this as a new norm,

regarding any other censorship, well thats just protected ones business, something i truly do understand

but how can u say respect the escort and allow that carrying on,

as i said hopefully a case of human error, mods are indeed human after all, even doozer

[samlad]

links cud be seen as shit stirring, and i have enu infractions currently,

i used no names, but the managment knows this case, merely pointing out, it not good to allow abuse, accusations (unproven) to be left on a site, which cud damage A PAYING ADVERTISER, i personal see it unfair, considering there was a high volume of posts deleted, and wudnt want to see this as a new norm,

regarding any other censorship, well thats just protected ones business, something i truly do understand

but how can u say respect the escort and allow that carrying on,

as i said hopefully a case of human error, mods are indeed human after all, even doozer

Why don't you PM these particular comments to me or Nicole rather than make a public point about it? We have actually been here throughout Westside's online lifespan, so there must have been something we have completely missed.

As for paying advertiser, you did post here for like a year before you actually did advertise, no? Paying for an advert doesn't give anyone any more right to post than anyone else, although we are far more lenient with escorts than clients, granted.

If there is a genuine concern, please PM me or Nicole.