Chloe's profile & something fishy

[anon361]

totally agree with you anon and thank you for you post. you were to the point clear and respectful of other posters opinions.
where i have a problem is as we have seen in the past there has also been agency's from the uk that do send girls on tour over here and are still part of an agency but are listed as independent as has been shown in the past and i feel its better to have as much info as possible as to if they are truly independent or agency.

I'm not saying it doesn't happen but to be honest, once her pictures matches her profile, she does all listed, provides a good service and is working for an agency of her own free will, then whether she is indo or Agency doesn't matter to me, that is her choice and shouldn't affect our esperience together.. It's the 2 bit agencies we have in this country that feck the whole thing up..
I remember this UK agency, they use to send some fantastic ladies over here and were upfront about it, I wish more were like them and followed their example, I'd have no problem visitng them..

[jayf1]

I'm not saying it doesn't happen but to be honest, once her pictures matches her profile, she does all listed, provides a good service and is working for an agency of her own free will, then whether she is indo or Agency doesn't matter to me, that is her choice and shouldn't affect our esperience together.. It's the 2 bit agencies we have in this country that feck the whole thing up..
I remember this UK agency, they use to send some fantastic ladies over here and were upfront about it, I wish more were like them and followed their example, I'd have no problem visitng them..

i remember them also they used to send some top class girls over here a lot of pornstars too but as you said they were up front about it i know they were listed as independent at the time but there was a post about that to inform everybody that they were in fact agency girls on tour.
and as can be seen from my posts i never said chloe is still with the agency all i have done is ask questions and i feel they are fair questions to be asked and fail to see why anybody would have a problem with them being asked.

[anon361]

i remember them also they used to send some top class girls over here a lot of pornstars too but as you said they were up front about it i know they were listed as independent at the time but there was a post about that to inform everybody that they were in fact agency girls on tour.
and as can be seen from my posts i never said chloe is still with the agency all i have done is ask questions and i feel they are fair questions to be asked and fail to see why anybody would have a problem with them being asked.

Ye, if I remeber correctly their was a problem listing them as touring agency and because they were over by themselve powers that be decided to list them as indos instead.
As for your question, if she had 2 profiles in this country fair enough but because they are in 2 seperate ones Sarah is correct, it is up to the lady in question what she does with her money and that includes wasting it / speculating it by keeping a second profile active, it's not for the sites to decide irrespective of the fact they are owned by the same company..

[jayf1]

Ye, if I remeber correctly their was a problem listing them as touring agency and because they were over by themselve powers that be decided to list them as indos instead.
As for your question, if she had 2 profiles in this country fair enough but because they are in 2 seperate ones Sarah is correct, it is up to the lady in question what she does with her money and that includes wasting it / speculating it by keeping a second profile active, it's not for the sites to decide irrespective of the fact they are owned by the same company..

thats true but if i remember correctly the other site you mentioned also put a note on the escorts profile that they were away touring and were unavilable in the uk at that time. something like that maybe should be looked at for e-i, e-e and e-s it could save a lot of confusion.

[anon361]

thats true but if i remember correctly the other site you mentioned also put a note on the escorts profile that they were away touring and were unavilable in the uk at that time. something like that maybe should be looked at for e-i, e-e and e-s it could save a lot of confusion.

Then that defeats the whole point of maintaining the original profile, who's gonna call if they know she is away..

[jayf1]

Then that defeats the whole point of maintaining the original profile, who's gonna call if they know she is away..

true but the way i see it is that the agency might also be keeping the profile active for the bait and switch.
we just dont know thats the point of asking questions.

[anon361]

true but the way i see it is that the agency might also be keeping the profile active for the bait and switch.
we just dont know thats the point of asking questions.

As the cops would say, that's out of our jurisdiction so F-all we can do about it, there's enough bait and switching going on over here to be worried about ones in another country, once we get the real lady who cares..

[jayf1]

As the cops would say, that's out of our jurisdiction so F-all we can do about it, there's enough bait and switching going on over here to be worried about ones in another country, once we get the real lady who cares..

a lot of people care as has been shown in another thread about agency escorts from romainia advertising as independents.