i don't consider it dumb, impassioned perhaps. it's my perception
of this forum, people seem to thrive on the type of stuff we've seen.
if one poster gets rumbled, he won't give up punting. perhaps it is bad business
practice. you can refer to me as dumb, do you think i would say that to you?
Last edited by lucy chambers; 21-10-11 at 12:57.
If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila
Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures
Dohnut Boy (21-10-11), MrNiceGuy2010 (21-10-11)
Not to be an arselick but I gotta agree with Ms Chambers, time to call the court of public opinion to order. This will run and run otherwise.
Hobby has failed to defend himself convincingly, and until he does then the ball is in his court. If we carry on like this someone will say something daft and another round of claim and counter claim will start of again.
Just my two cents worth
“'Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit; wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.”.
I have one question and Hobby's post does not answer it, It is speculative I know. But I believe we all should stop and take stock not only of the events of the past week, but of the timing of the events...
What is the agenda here?
It is time I believe to look beyond the virtual walls of EI and consider the wider political climate that the escorting business operates. A quick glance at the who's doing what section earlier this week showed that overwhelmingly the guests were reading some thread to do with the disagreement. My only point being if the outside world are looking in to pass judgment around the question of criminalization of punters they have a wonderful spectacle full of malicious accusations to throw up and use as evidence of why criminalization is the best policy. Only a thought.
doodlebug (21-10-11)
Only one other person have I seen post on these boards and use so many words to say absolutely bugger all.
Nowt but wind and piss.
Dohnut Boy (21-10-11), Ebony Amber (21-10-11), Prickly (21-10-11)