Experience affecting objectivity

[ksteve]

I have noticed when reading reviews that the client's objectivity can be affected by how he perceives his experience with the lady at the booking. I think it fair to say that most readers of reviews will interpret the ' very attractive ' , 'fairly attractive ' tick boxes as referring , primarily, to the physical presntation and looks of the escort. I am sure most guys will quickly be able to refer to a woman they know or perhaps someone in the media or movies etc , someone who they would regard as a thundering bitch but yet still acknowledge that she is ' very attractive '.

I saw this review today of Rebeka;

https://www.escort-ireland.com/escor...le-escort.html

I thought it interesting that because he had a negative experience, my guess is he did just refused to tick the top ' very attractive ' box. Now, whatever anyone might think of Rebeka, if you are a straight male, you cannot possibly tick any other box than the 'very attractive ' one - it is an indisputable world fact.

I have seen this and other types of distortion in reviews. So much of how we view things is based upon our own experience , and objectivity goes out the window. Perhaps a good thing in many respects as nothing can be taken for granted. If a particular guy clicks with an escort, he is likely to tick the box above where he might have done otherwise.

[samlad]

This is subjective to the individual, and 'attractiveness' may be perceived by the individual as both physical and personality attributes, so a physically attractive escort may come across as ugly if he/she is rude (I'm talking generally! I'm not that I'm saying Rebeka is rude by the way! She's always lovely with me ).

[ksteve]

This is subjective to the individual, and 'attractiveness' may be perceived by the individual as both physical and personality attributes, so a physically attractive escort may come across as ugly if he/she is rude (I'm talking generally! I'm not that I'm saying Rebeka is rude by the way! She's always lovely with me ).

Yes and thats why I underlined the word ' primarily '. As to subjectivity, I would be interested to see if there would be any straight male who genuinely holds the view that Rebeka is not a physically attractive woman. ?

[saoirsemac]

if u read the review he say ill stick to the matures maybe mature is his thing, different stroke for different folks, ive clients who cant bare a girl under a size 16 and think thin is unattractive likewise their is alot of gentlemen out their who wud find my more ample curves replusive beuty my friend is truly in the eye of the beholder! yes rebaka is a stunning girl and converts well into the media image of beuty, so yes vast majorty will find her attractive per their is those few who like other things such as mature bbw etc....

futhermore sam is so right if the person is a knob and yet again not refering to rebaka here then i wud find them very off putting myself

[anon361]

Attractiveness is a very grey area, some of the super models in magazines and on tv are very attractive, when I click that option am I saying they are as attractive as those ladies or am I saying for the average lady they are very attactive. What scale are you basing yourself on when choosing and it is that which causes the difference of opinion.

[samlad]

It's easy to state that an escort is either attractive or unattractive based on the superficial aspects, but even someone that isn't considered to be generally 'attractive' to one person can shine like a beacon because of a particular smile or glint in their eye to another.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, to coin a cliche.