Should the Trusted Review status be abolished?

[Lucy Chambers]

this is getting ridiculous ; its clear the majority of girls want it gone, but at moment there is no alternative and i think there needs to be SOME system?
if there are trs going around abusing and taking advantage, its very simple; EI can have a system for these guys to be reported, cos they should be;
EI then contacts the person (similar to if a girl s does not like/questions a negative review) and removes badge if the person cant satisfy the mod they acted approipriately, or if there are reopeated complaints by different ppl;
it should act as deterrrent, would not take long for the bad ones to be weeded out?

Ok then, lets turn this around a bit. Should there be a ''trusted'' escort system too?

[nick2010]

Ok then, lets turn this around a bit. Should there be a ''trusted'' escort system too?

I think that is a great idea Lucy .... lol

[kelso]

Ok then, lets turn this around a bit. Should there be a ''trusted'' escort system too?

i think there is lucy, for me its a person with 9/10 positives from Trs/others i think are genuine!!

[Lucy Chambers]

i think there is lucy, for me its a person with 9/10 positives from Trs/others i think are genuine!!

Yes, point taken. However without being facetious this system is not workable.

So, if we take out the trusted reviewer element, all we have left is reviews. It has been repeatedly shown that both escorts and reviewers can manipulate the system.

I propose that Chief Hander has the best idea.

[Bruno69]

In response to Kelso...
Similarly there is a 'trusted reviewer' system in place in that an escort can make a comment on her review and even get it ratted and I've seen quite measured reviews mysteriously disappear ( speaking of systems open to abuse !).

All of that is good enough for me, if not perfect.

Utopia is a difficult target and an unnecessary one at that.

[Lucy Chambers]

Similarly there is a 'trusted reviewer' system in place in that an escort can make a comment on her review and even get it ratted and I've seen quite measured reviews mysteriously disappear ( speaking of systems open to abuse !).

All of that is good enough for me, if not perfect.



Utopia is a difficult target and an unnecessary one at that.

Different thread for that one Mr B. My opinion is that any genuine review should never be deleted. Verboten.

[10inchesandcounting]

Ok then, lets turn this around a bit. Should there be a ''trusted'' escort system too?

There is a tread about "reliable escorts "that was started a while ago, I am not sure if it has been kept updated since it is not recommended to bump up threads.

[kelso]

This debate will rage on forever. I'm off to the gym. I'm sure this thread will have taken on a new life by the time I get back. Have fun everyone!!

i think you have the right idea man! im curreently looking up the page to see whose gym im going to be 'working out' in this evening ...

[El Gordo]

Here are the votes so far, by type of voter:
Escorts: 15 Yes, 5 No
TR's: 4 Yes, 15 No
Others: 43 Yes, 29 No

[Violette]

The TR system like this site needs a revamping. But we will deal with the TR issue for the moment. Allow me to preface this statement with this: The TR's I have seen to date have been absolutely perfect gentleman, I haven't a bad word about any of them.
But in all areas of life you will have bad mixed in with the good, and of course the bad will get the most notice, because let's be honest a plane crash killing 100 people makes for better headlines. Thus is the case with the very few bad TR here. I suggest instead of getting rid of the system all together, I mean some men have shagged half of UN to get to this point, and all that hard-ahem-work, shouldn't go to waste. Why not change it so it is like the popularity bar under our profiles? Instead of Trusted Reviewer, some people take this WAY too serious and feel they have to adhere to certain international standards of shagging. Why not make it a bit more fun? The guys earn points as they leave reviews. The reviews are still relevant, but if someone puts up a fake review, or a ratted review, it will subtract from their punter rep/street cred/shaggability, whatever you want to call it. As it stands now even ratted reviews and those damn annoying N/A reports are counted towards the over all total of the TR/reviewer scorecard.
Reviews do serve a purpose to inform other punters of what is out there. With the implementation of something like this, everyone would have a rating, from Mr. Fussy, to the newest newbie on the block. What do you guys think?