Sweet Rachel

[JAMESCORK]

[QUOTE=lucy chambers;444159]

Now look what you did, you broke the Internet.

To be honest, I havent got a shred of evidence. Because I dont hold the IP technology, not do I cross reference profiles, google numbers or check nationalities. I am not paid to, nor do I have any interest in doing so. I do know for sure that Rachel was here under two other escort profiles, one Turkish and one Italian. With fake pictures. These prior to Alexandra, indeed, one with a fake photo report for Nov 2010. I know this because I have seen the screenshots of the profiles.

Hardly a crime. Some of our good friends here have the odd name change. A change of nationaliy is also rampant. But once we settled on Rachel did not the profile still carry all reviews from previous aliases.

[ThomasJ]

Sweet Jesus not more about Sweet Rachel.

[wanted the best 69]

[QUOTE=JAMESCORK;444177]

Hardly a crime. Some of our good friends here have the odd name change. A change of nationaliy is also rampant. But once we settled on Rachel did not the profile still carry all reviews from previous aliases.

go on jimbo, 800 years ,get stuck in bouy, ps tongue in cheek

[Quarterpoundher]

QPH. You have a fantastic history here of serving the members and rooting out fakes. Do not for a second think I do not applaud your efforts. But your vagueness is frustrating.

Thats Ok, I know your not and if your frustrated then imagine how I am feeling, I have to be vague now and again, I dont want to, its against my natural instincts and I have more then anyone taken the time to post full proof of all I say, but for reasons i cant go into I cant on somethings, so on these occasions its down to do people trust my word based on track record of providing proof on many other times about many issues? if you do then being vague on some things may be better then not having any inkling at all. I don't have any option at times.

[SADumas]

Yup



Yup



Yup



Yup



Okkkayyy

In you other life you must have been a cracking solicitor. Thorough and straight to the point. You go girl.

[Lucy Chambers]

[QUOTE=JAMESCORK;444177]

Hardly a crime. Some of our good friends here have the odd name change. A change of nationaliy is also rampant. But once we settled on Rachel did not the profile still carry all reviews from previous aliases.

I'm a bit tired of saying the same things darling. If you want to find out more, do so.

Besides, she is in the chatroom often enough, go and have a chat.

[Blond chick NIKKY]

Did i missed smth?

[JAMESCORK]

[QUOTE=lucy chambers;444196]

I'm a bit tired of saying the same things darling. If you want to find out more, do so.

Besides, she is in the chatroom often enough, go and have a chat.

That's a cop out Lucy and you know it. NOBODY can even offer a shred of evidence.

I'll tell ye what. If somebody has CONCLUSIVE evidence but us afraid to post it, PM me, and with discretion assured I will examine it and report back here. If none is forthcoming what does that tell us.

[Monkeynut]

I love threads like these. Lots of people with snippets of info, adding 2+2 and getting 46 .....

I love the IP thing .... we know who you are by the IP ... me arse. I was in a coffee shop yesterday on my laptop using their WiFi along with 6 others. Now supposing we were all on this site .... what would have happened then? According to my IP address right now .. Im in Enniscorthy... Im not, Im in Dublin so that doesnt work very well ...

As for asking people who know about the bannings, well I did just that and sat around a kitchen table drinking tea with some of the names mentioned.

I love threads like these ......

[Rayden]

Rachel was hawt!!