Archived User
Certified E-I Addict
You're right. That's also a flip side to these reports. They create a new username, use new pictures and the process starts again. Such is life I'm afraid. However, when they get found out, reviews are transfered across, profiles are deactivated and the circle begins again.Originally Posted by corkpunter
Last edited by samlad; 02-04-11 at 23:16.
What about when an escort serves her 30 days then posts fakes again?
I ask this because back in November I posted a fake photo report for Tinna as far as I remember she got another one and had to serve a ban. She has since returned without the reports attached to her name so looks like any other escort touring with 6 positive reviews. She has one neutral review saying she looks nothing like her photos. Also, since returning she has picked up another fake photo report.
Can I ask what happens to people like Tinna, she is an obvious multiple repeat offender and doesn't show any sign of posting verified photos at any stage. Why should her fake photo reports disappear and let her have a second chance.
Finally, how the fuck does she currently have verified photos? Seriously, just for shits and giggles can you please show these to a 5 year old and get their opinion on the validity of them
Archived User
Certified E-I Addict
We've updated the process since November. If they do it again, the ban goes back up. The actual fake photo reports stay on the profiles for 3 months. It's really not in their best interests to keep posting fake pictures.
Sam, it's the same as if she never had the previous reports is what I mean, if she gets caught again she serves 30 days and had the report stigma for 3 months, same as before, no? So IMO and from what you seem to be saying above is that an escort can carry on with this as long as she wants and E-I won't ban her, just keep taking her cash, right?
Finally, can someone please throw another eye over her pics, as I doubt very much she is the girl in the photos
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
Thats very good news Sam but just something I would like to ask, how long does a helper have to be a helper to be as trusted as someone you see face to face? why would someone who has helped for over a year not be trusted in this position but someone who applies and meets face to face but who you might only know about for a few days be given total access no problem?
Its a bit of a slap in the face to those that have proven they can be trusted.
I just am interested why seeing someone makes them more trusted with such info as those you don't see across the office desk but have worked hard across a cyber desk for a long time.
The guy who leaked all that stuff to Wiki was seen face to face by those employing him.
Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 03-04-11 at 00:35.
Archived User
Certified E-I Addict
Well for one, someone with access to this level of information would have to work in the office. As for the current site helpers, we have all their personal information on record now, so we do know how we are working with, and this is now a requirement to become a site helper.
Trust is always a big deal. Like you say, a person could still leak information even if they are face to face. Who can you trust these days? The EI staff are also expected to sign a clause not to disclose such sensitive information. The site helpers, as they are not involved face to face with us, do not have access to this information, but we still require their personal details (addresses, contact numbers, etc.).
Last edited by samlad; 03-04-11 at 00:44.
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
Thank you Sam, that was interesting. From what you say then really its just the signing of that non disclosure thats stopping a cyber helper being a full employee, you already have all other details, no reason why not as lots of companys do similar.
Just curious, thanks for replying.
Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 03-04-11 at 00:48.
Archived User
Certified E-I Addict
No, I didn't say that at all. I said that the staff we have have all had to disclose their personal details to EI so we know who they are, and that they do not have a high level of access priviledges because we do not work with them face to face. Just to add, because they do not work in the office, they are not trained to deal with the back office issues.
Mods are there to police the site and help with general queries, not to investigate profiles and other matters they don't have access to.
UKHeather (03-04-11)
Escort (Non Advertiser)
Certified E-I Addict
I would not like mods or site helpers to have access to any personal information nor verification details, infact nothing more than is available to see on my profile.
kelly curvybabe (03-04-11)
Banned User
Certified E-I Addict
Thats all fair enough Sam but just on fake pic report coverage on the weekend, surely a mod being able to see the submitted report and being able to clearly see its from a pornsite, could they not just have the option to activate it? no private data had to be seen, all they need to see is the link thats being reported and the live current profile thats being reported.
If that was technically possible no sensitive data has to be accessed at all. I totally agree that no one not there should see verification pics etc, I am only putting forward a way that reports could be activated during the weekend.
Last edited by Quarterpoundher; 03-04-11 at 01:02.
Posting Permissions
