Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 159

Thread: Banned users

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,037
    Blog Entries
    5
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    Surely the best way for this to be dealt with, to stop the sniping on both sides is for E1 to add some detail as to why they have been banned (you don't have to give away trade secrets for god sake) then the people on the forum might be a bit more enlightened as to whats really going on.
    Come in she said "I'll give you shelter from the storm "

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to mellors For This Useful Post:

    wanted the best 69 (15-03-11)

  3. #102
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quarterpoundher View Post
    Well said... nuff said...
    Ya see, all it took as a little controversy and a thread about bannings to get all the old mods back again.........

    Pity I can't hang around............

    Have fun kids.................
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to luther For This Useful Post:

    Shirley Joy (14-03-11)

  5. #103
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mellors View Post
    Surely the best way for this to be dealt with, to stop the sniping on both sides is for E1 to add some detail as to why they have been banned (you don't have to give away trade secrets for god sake) then the people on the forum might be a bit more enlightened as to whats really going on.
    There are already some people on here that are aware of some of the evidence we have. I think that telling you who was banned with the basic reasons why is good enough (see the original post of this thread). As for evidence, this is something we hold and will not discuss in public I'm afraid.

  6. #104
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,137
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    wow!! the one day i dont log on at work!!!

  7. #105
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,037
    Blog Entries
    5
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    There are already some people on here that are aware of some of the evidence we have. I think that telling you who was banned with the basic reasons why is good enough (see the original post of this thread). As for evidence, this is something we hold and will not discuss in public I'm afraid.
    Well it's obviously not, as you have banned users proclaiming their innocence and others hinting at a gunman on the grassy knoll type scenario. Whats a poor boy to believe
    Come in she said "I'll give you shelter from the storm "

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to mellors For This Useful Post:

    wanted the best 69 (15-03-11)

  9. #106
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mellors View Post
    Well it's obviously not, as you have banned users proclaiming their innocence and others hinting at a gunman on the grassy knoll type scenario. Whats a poor boy to believe
    Well, it's up to you to decide that. Do consider this this: why would we would have an issue with these posters in the first place? I'm not going to try and spend the remainder of the week trying to sway peoples' opinions.

  10. #107
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,037
    Blog Entries
    5
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Well, it's up to you to decide that. Do consider this this: why would we would have an issue with these posters in the first place? I'm not going to try and spend the remainder of the week trying to sway peoples' opinions.
    Obviously you had good reason to do what you did, I'm not taking sides, just looking for a bit of clarity
    Come in she said "I'll give you shelter from the storm "

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to mellors For This Useful Post:

    wanted the best 69 (15-03-11)

  12. #108
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    942

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Hello everyone,

    The staff here at E-I have been undergoing some investigations regarding a particular group of posters. We have been monitoring the activity of these users and have been doing some research behind the scenes over the past few weeks, and as managers we have been asked to try and prevent this from becoming a public issue on the message boards so that we can pursue this matter.

    Some people that have been aware of this have cooperated with us and we would like to thank you for that, however there have also been one or two individuals that have decided to push this matter and this has impeded our investigation, so we have not been able to pursue the matter to the degree we wanted to, however we have enough overwhelming evidence to ban these users from the message boards.

    The people that have been banned are the following:

    -Hornylimerick
    -Poggo
    -DemiDrew
    -Mileysweet
    -Sweet Rachel
    -Aliciasexy

    Without going into too much detail on the matter, I can tell you that we believe several of these users have been accessing and posting from each other's accounts, as well as submitting reviews from multiple profiles. We do take such matters extremely seriously and sometimes we have to allow things to run its course over a period of time to gather enough information.

    Thank you for taking the time to read this. I am sure this may come as a shock to some of you but not so much to others.
    Intresting and shocking.........

  13. #109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkeynut View Post
    I would like to see the evidence on which these bannings were based ......

    You yourself, Lucy, have been vocal on the boards in the past regarding these banned members when nobody on the boards gave a shit and at the end of the day the paying punters dont give a shit about your reasons for being vocal. You do Lucy because you are an escort and you should have conducted your concerns in the private escort section but you chose not to.

    Why?
    Are the bad reviews relevant in the private section? Of course they arent. I am tired of nursing people. If they dont get it, it is not my problem. I am a bit sicvk of being accused of things, to be honest.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    An don (14-03-11), Shirley Joy (14-03-11)

  15. #110
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    If they dont get it, it is not my problem. I am a bit sicvk of being accused of things, to be honest.
    Dont worry about it , they are certainly not worth you troubling yourself.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to An don For This Useful Post:

    Shirley Joy (14-03-11)

Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •