check out this sexy stud :D

[anon361]

I'm sorry but while I can see the funny side I find this whole thread offensive and I'm disappointed in both mods and managers taking part in slagging off a paying advertiser of this site. If as someone already said the shoe was on the other foot and it was a pot bellied female escort that was being slagged off their would be plenty of bans and infractions handed out on this thread, that's if it was even allowed to remain on the boards. Just because it's a man it's alright

[samlad]

I'm sorry but while I can see the funny side I find this whole thread offensive and I'm disappointed in both mods and managers taking part in slagging off a paying advertiser of this site. If as someone already said the shoe was on the other foot and it was a pot bellied female escort that was being slagged off their would be plenty of bans and infractions handed out on this thread, that's if it was even allowed to remain on the boards. Just because it's a man it's alright

Yes, a very well balanced and thought out argument here. Something to consider, people.

[scotus]

so have we got some egar beavers ready to got out and do some reviewing for this young chap
if he just had one review it would make all the differance

Even at the best of times there seems to be a marked reluctance to leave reviews for TVs. Check the TVs listed in Dublin - Hardly any reviews left for almost all of them.

[Lucy Chambers]

I'm sorry but while I can see the funny side I find this whole thread offensive and I'm disappointed in both mods and managers taking part in slagging off a paying advertiser of this site. If as someone already said the shoe was on the other foot and it was a pot bellied female escort that was being slagged off their would be plenty of bans and infractions handed out on this thread, that's if it was even allowed to remain on the boards. Just because it's a man it's alright

There has to be a point where we cut the PC crap, this is the internet. I appreciate your point but it isnt a woman, it is a man, and unfortunately the very nature of putting those pictures up on the internet invites comment. No offence Anon, but you are the first one to fight for freedom of speech on other issues

Besides there was precident, a post was put up about a ladies boots not so long ago, that descended into something quite different to this. I dont think anyone has said anything nasty.

[scotus]

I'm sorry but while I can see the funny side I find this whole thread offensive and I'm disappointed in both mods and managers taking part in slagging off a paying advertiser of this site. If as someone already said the shoe was on the other foot and it was a pot bellied female escort that was being slagged off their would be plenty of bans and infractions handed out on this thread, that's if it was even allowed to remain on the boards. Just because it's a man it's alright

Ok Ok You're quite right - I hold my hands up unreservedly and apologise.

I know it's not excusable, but it was getting late and I was getting a bit giddy. I don't normally do this, so please accept it as a once-off aberration on my part

[Rayden]

He is certainly not what I would call a traditional TV. As I said earlier, I think he would be better off advertising as a male escort who offers a cross-dressing service.

[anon361]

There has to be a point where we cut the PC crap, this is the internet. I appreciate your point but it isn't a woman, it is a man, and unfortunately the very nature of putting those pictures up on the internet invites comment. No offence Anon, but you are the first one to fight for freedom of speech on other issues

Besides there was precedent, a post was put up about a ladies boots not so long ago, that descended into something quite different to this. I don't think anyone has said anything nasty.

I do agree with freedom of speech but IMO this has nothing to do with political correctness, it's opening a window to allow paying advertisers to be slagged off on this site, what next week it will be a 60 year old escort, or an escorts teeth and all they have to do is refer back to this thread where managers, mods and escorts actively took part in slagging a paying advertiser and they would have a point..
I wouldn't mind if he advertised somewhere else but he isn't so therefore he should be afforded the same courtesy as a female advertiser and his integrity as an advertiser protected as such..

[samlad]

I do agree with freedom of speech but IMO this has nothing to do with political correctness, it's opening a window to allow paying advertisers to be slagged off on this site, what next week it will be a 60 year old escort, or an escorts teeth and all they have to do is refer back to this thread where managers, mods and escorts actively took part in slagging a paying advertiser and they would have a point..
I wouldn't mind if he advertised somewhere else but he isn't so therefore he should be afforded the same courtesy as a female advertiser and his integrity as an advertiser protected as such..

I have to agree... this has been an issue in the client request section and I've had to apply rules regarding such incidents.

[Lucy Chambers]

I do agree with freedom of speech but IMO this has nothing to do with political correctness, it's opening a window to allow paying advertisers to be slagged off on this site, what next week it will be a 60 year old escort, or an escorts teeth and all they have to do is refer back to this thread where managers, mods and escorts actively took part in slagging a paying advertiser and they would have a point..
I wouldn't mind if he advertised somewhere else but he isn't so therefore he should be afforded the same courtesy as a female advertiser and his integrity as an advertiser protected as such..

Ok. Point taken

[anon361]

Fecking hell, I just read back my posts, sorry for being such a killjoy