Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Czechs Under Fire For 'Arousal' Testing

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doozer View Post
    Lie detectors , No.
    They are the most unreliable equipment ever in use.
    Anyone can get over a lie detector by staying calm or permenantly on edge and get false readings
    What you want is fMRI mapping of the brain to show that the brain is pychicaly lying
    or to show the arousal in teh brain as its happening
    Agreed... surely all those 'gentlemen' off the Jeremy Kyle Show MUST be telling the truth!!!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    22,426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Agreed... surely all those 'gentlemen' off the Jeremy Kyle Show MUST be telling the truth!!!
    Thats the thing
    You see the guests on Jermey Kyle of Mauri Povich and the are the bottom rung of society who havent a brain cell between them and tehy are told that this machaine can magically tell you if your lying. They never say, ' But Bubba said if thays were real theyes wud be uzed in de courts wudnt day?'
    Join the E-I Fantasy Football League

    http://www.escort-ireland.com/boards...ntasy-Football

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaylord View Post
    Thanks for that Carlos. So, should we be using lie detectors in the general scrutinisation of asylum applicants?

    GL
    I've just read Doozer's answer to that question, and I'm happy to go along with what he posted. You need a method of getting as close as possible to a 100% accurate result, or better still, one should base decisions on information gathered from different sources and using different methods.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carlos marvado View Post
    I've just read Doozer's answer to that question, and I'm happy to go along with what he posted. You need a method of getting as close as possible to a 100% accurate result, or better still, one should base decisions on information gathered from different sources and using different methods.
    But DNA testing is not 100%, but we rely on this method as part of the evidence gathering process....??
    Perhaps the lawyers and judges don't want the competition, which is what lie detector usage would be

    GL
    "Keep it real with me, and I'll keep it real with you"

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    22,426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaylord View Post
    But DNA testing is not 100%, but we rely on this method as part of the evidence gathering process....??
    Perhaps the lawyers and judges don't want the competition, which is what lie detector usage would be

    GL

    Thats very true GL
    DNA testing isnt 100% and a lot of time it gets contaminated by bad practce
    or the jury are influenced by the CSI effect
    As I said teh only credible way is to use fMRI brain mapping, getting a base rate and looking for arousal patterns when found to be evading the truth
    Join the E-I Fantasy Football League

    http://www.escort-ireland.com/boards...ntasy-Football

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •