Trusted Reviewrs Criteria...Is it time for a rethink...

[An don]

Was there ever any input from the forum on the TR badges or was is always the 3 references from escorts

[Ric Hardgear]

[QUOTE=JAMESCORK;325858]Luce I really think contacting the Escort after each review is not workable, and in any case to what end. What really is being put forward here is if lets say Ric Hardgear, to pull a name from a hat, was automatically given TR status, would he qualify as trusted. We all know he is a tool but that is the reassuring part…we all know him.....

excuse me ,I take serious offence to this ......

[Ric Hardgear]

do not insult me to make your opinion seem valid,your point is befuddled and insulting

[JAMESCORK]

do not insult me to make your opinion seem valid,your point is befuddled and insulting

Befuddled....It would seem that you are the befuddled one pal...sleep on it...and when you wake up tomorrow..you are still a tool.

Life is tough on some Riclesby.....lol.

[Ric Hardgear]

Befuddled....It would seem that you are the befuddled one pal...sleep on it...and when you wake up tomorrow..you are still a tool.

Life is tough on some Riclesby.....lol.

ah i thought it may have been a glib remark but it seems you wanted to insult me ,...why god only knows..maybe you can pm me in the morning and wake up a gent....at the moment your a rambling fool....oh forgot to include... lol...

[JAMESCORK]

ah i thought it may have been a glib remark but it seems you wanted to insult me ,...why god only knows..maybe you can pm me in the morning and wake up a gent....at the moment your a rambling fool....oh forgot to include... lol...

Wooooh take it easy Ric I'm winding you up. You know I love you. Or are you winding me up cos I was winding you up. I go on the assumption that "You are a tool" is the forum catchphrase for "howya buddy" Maybe I'm wrong. If so sorry bud.

[takemedrunkimhome]

Sorry to start a thread and then flake off to a long relaxing lunch and not be here to answer.



As it happens buddy with the current rules a PM from the Escort is not permissible it has to be written on paper FFS.



Exactly why the existing model isn’t working



There is no question of any lists being drawn up, it should be an automatic status based on a new criteria (this is the conundrum …what is the criteria…this is the discussion). There is no reason to have an open forum to evaluate a reviewers reviews no more than there is at the mo.



Nice to see the Mods are open to suggestion, that’s half the battle



Now we’re talking…this is the discussion at hand…



Not quite true pal, Escorts may tour the country before they arrive at your doorstep and experiences outside of your area are useful.



A TR is not escort type specific. Each category will have its own TRs by default.



This is exactly the mindset we need to get away from. TR status is not to impress the ladies it is to help fellow punters read reviews more effectively.



Not quite true. I would often try out a lady with few or no reviews and I would think that once the TR system is working adequately, if I, a TR were to leave a positive one it may serve her better than a review from a non TR.

I think we should all go away and think about this for a while and come back with ideas of how best we may distribute TR status. I am thinking on the grounds of qty of posts and qty of reviews to date. Once the criteria is met TR status is applied automtically. Maybe staff could put forward a poll type thread stating that "the following members now comply, if any member would like to dispute any of the above please vote now" and the vote is private to staff only. I dunno just throwing up suggestions....

Maybe Ill start a new thread on Monday to see if we have any ideas by then...

What ye think...

Sorry James, maybe its my wording but when I say localised, I mean the reviewers and not the escorts as I am aware that they tour, but not all punters do.
My bad for not being clearer.