?????//????

[Alana]

I dont think its helpful that there are no comments as to why the rats were added or by who

[diannasweet]

hi girls.....gotta say am confuse myself how this rated system works as i seen on several time a username having few reviews and from all only 2 or 3 rated......

[Alana]

hi girls.....gotta say am confuse myself how this rated system works as i seen on several time a username having few reviews and from all only 2 or 3 rated......

Hi Dianna,
Sometimes it's obvious things like review IN CAPS, or perhaps little or no coherent english etc. Things start to get confusing when only some of a reviewers reviews are ratted and some not. It would be handy if a comment as to why the rat was placed and by who. That being said i have seen a few reviews with an explanation 9x3 the ex review mod used to give explanation etc most of the time, consistency seems to be a problem.

Elle x

[Quarterpoundher]

Hi Dianna,
Sometimes it's obvious things like review IN CAPS, or perhaps little or no coherent english etc. Things start to get confusing when only some of a reviewers reviews are ratted and some not. It would be handy if a comment as to why the rat was placed and by who. That being said i have seen a few reviews with an explanation 9x3 the ex review mod used to give explanation etc most of the time, consistency seems to be a problem.

Elle x

I would agree that an explaination is best if possible but sometimes to do that would alert fakers how we knew it was a fake and they would change tactics.

[Alana]

I would agree that an explaination is best if possible but sometimes to do that would alert fakers how we knew it was a fake and they would change tactics.

Why are some reviews rejected or edited or ratted?
We reject or edit or rat escort reviews submitted to us if:
(a) We establish they are untrue / malicious
(b) They are very poorly written / illegible / typed all in CAPS
(c) Our systems determine they are likely to be escort self-promotion (We record the IP etc details of each review submitted. Escorts can register multiple IDs here, and then post multiple positive reviews of themselves, but we will almost certainly catch you out if you try to play this game!)
(d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
(e) The review contains swearing, insulting, degrading or abusive language.
(f) The review reveals info about the escort that it is not necessary to say and may comprimise the lady's privacy, e.g. saying exactly what hotel or apartments she is in, that she has a tattoo of X or is a student of Y etc.
(g) The review is a sexually explicit review of an escort who has asked clients not to leave sexually explicit reviews. Where a lady has requested reviewers don't leave sexually explicit reviews, a message stating this is shown to the reviewer at the time he is making the review. We ask reviewers to respect the escorts wishes in this situation, i.e. Say the lady provided a poor service by all means if you feel she did, but don't say her blow job skills were lacking or something explicit like that.
(h) The review is negative but no explanation as to why is given. It is not considered fair to leave a negative review without saying why.
(i) The reviews is not entirely in English. No foreign language reviews or comments not in English are allowed.
(j) The review has been copied from somewhere else.

Its not as if were talking about national security here QPH, the hurdles to overcome whether good or bad are listed above for all to see, the point i'm making is if a review is ratted which of the above is it ? and who decided ? this would give the escort or client a direct name to deal with to sort the matter out and enable her/him to respond to which review has been questioned and why.
Anti-virus companies employ the best hackers in the world for a reason, because the tatics are always changing however the blatantly obvious is ofton staring us in the face.

[Quarterpoundher]

Its not as if were talking about national security here QPH, the hurdles to overcome whether good or bad are listed above for all to see, the point i'm making is if a review is ratted which of the above is it ? and who decided ? this would give the escort or client a direct name to deal with to sort the matter out and enable her/him to respond to which review has been questioned and why.
Anti-virus companies employ the best hackers in the world for a reason, because the tatics are always changing however the blatantly obvious is ofton staring us in the face.

No we are not Elle... but I have come up with one or two ways of seeing if a reviewer is probably a faker and there is not a lot of point in telling him how on the ratted review as then he will change tactic's and not do that again so would you rather it be ratted and hopefully you might trust my honesty in why its ratted but not state why or would you rather I tell all and have more fakes submitted by him or others that I would not be able to use anymore?

In fairness I try and state why I feel they are fake, pointed out contradictions and if he said xyz I pointed out if many others said the opposite and I recall I got my ass handed to me for doing so again to the broader readership make up your minds.

Also.. but when a review is ratted is says something along the lines that we "feel" its fake.. does not say anything about we have come up with Judge Judy level proof, that wording has been there on a rat statement since long before any com mods started helping in reviews.

[TiffanyTees]

Why are some reviews rejected or edited or ratted?
We reject or edit or rat escort reviews submitted to us if:
(a) We establish they are untrue / malicious
(b) They are very poorly written / illegible / typed all in CAPS
(c) Our systems determine they are likely to be escort self-promotion (We record the IP etc details of each review submitted. Escorts can register multiple IDs here, and then post multiple positive reviews of themselves, but we will almost certainly catch you out if you try to play this game!)
(d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
(e) The review contains swearing, insulting, degrading or abusive language.
(f) The review reveals info about the escort that it is not necessary to say and may comprimise the lady's privacy, e.g. saying exactly what hotel or apartments she is in, that she has a tattoo of X or is a student of Y etc.
(g) The review is a sexually explicit review of an escort who has asked clients not to leave sexually explicit reviews. Where a lady has requested reviewers don't leave sexually explicit reviews, a message stating this is shown to the reviewer at the time he is making the review. We ask reviewers to respect the escorts wishes in this situation, i.e. Say the lady provided a poor service by all means if you feel she did, but don't say her blow job skills were lacking or something explicit like that.
(h) The review is negative but no explanation as to why is given. It is not considered fair to leave a negative review without saying why.
(i) The reviews is not entirely in English. No foreign language reviews or comments not in English are allowed.
(j) The review has been copied from somewhere else.

DONT let it worry you Nikky babe !

As there are agencies ,other escorts ,pimps whatever will do reviews to discolour your reputation .I am sure everyone who knows you and met you wont take any notice of it at all.
love n licks Tiff xx

[BruceAlmighty]

I agree 100% - either the reviewer is ratted completely as a potential fake or is not ratted as all. And IMO, 6 negative reviews, 3 'N/As' out of 12 total is quite suspect. Few people are that unlucky under the law of averages.....

[BruceAlmighty]

Indeed, Kelly - an interesting decision by the reviews mods.