Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Ruhama backs Judge Neilan's calls for brothel users to be named and shamed

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ber View Post
    I presume ull warn her and ban her for a week
    LOL i will let that to the others.

    Dont do it again Sweetie,
    Westside.

    PS i read the headings when it comes to Ruhama as i have absolutly no interest in these ppl as i think they create dangers for escorts and women in general.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ber View Post
    Can anyone explain why it is ok to publish this ladies name and adress here in full when usually the post is edited and then followed by alot of tut tuting and saying how we can not publish names . Better still 2 mods have replied to the thread and ignored it. So i presume now we can print names as we wish
    Sorry Ber, a slip on my part. Yes the ladies name is already in paper etc, but we don't need to add to it by having her name here too, so it shouldn't have been put here. Sometimes I miss something when I copy and paste.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    Or is it because it was Patricias post and I'm hardly going to edit it???
    At least you what side your bread is buttered on. lol

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •